Matilda of Scotland was the daughter of Malcolm III Canmore, King of Scots, and his wife, the saintly Queen Margaret. With Margaret’s descent from Alfred the Great, Matilda not only had the blood of Scottish kings flowing through her veins but also that of England’s Anglo-Saxon rulers. Born in the second half of 1080, Matilda was named Edith at her baptism, her name being changed to Matilda at the time of her marriage, most likely to make it more acceptable to the Norman barons. To avoid confusion, we will call her Matilda for the whole article.
The baby princess’s godfather was none other than Robert Curthose, who was visiting Scotland at the time of her birth. Her godmother was England’s queen, Matilda of Flanders. She and her younger sister, Mary, who was born in 1082, were sent to England to be educated by their maternal aunt Christina, at Romsey Abbey in 1086. A nun who spent time at both Romsey and Wilton abbeys, Christina was said to have treated Matilda harshly, the young princess constantly ‘in fear of the rod of my aunt’.1 Christina’s treatment of Matilda was made public during a church inquiry into whether or not Matilda had, in fact, been professed as a nun, at which point Matilda made her striking references to the ‘rage and hatred … that boiled up in me’.2
Before 1093 the two Scottish princesses, now approaching their teens, had moved on to Wilton Abbey to continue their education, away from the harsh discipline of their aunt. Like Romsey, Wilton was a renowned centre for women’s education and learning. It could accommodate between eighty and ninety women, and was once patronised by Edward the Confessor’s wife, Edith of Wessex. The abbey had a reputation for educating women from the highest echelons of the nobility and the royal family itself; the girls’ mother, Queen Margaret, had also been sent to Wilton to be educated after arriving in England in the late 1050s. The abbey was a popular destination for pilgrims, housing among its relics ‘a nail from the True Cross, a portion of the Venerable Bede and the body of St Edith’.3 Matilda’s first language was English, but she is known to have spoken French at Wilton. She also learned some Latin, read both the old and new testaments of the Bible, ‘the books of the Church fathers and some of the major Latin writers’.4
Malcolm IV and St Margaret
By 1093, thoughts were turning to Matilda’s future, but politics intervened. King Malcolm had a disagreement with King William II Rufus after which ‘they parted with great discord, and the king Malcolm returned home to Scotland.’5 On his way home, Malcolm stopped at Wilton to collect his daughters. On his arrival, he found Matilda wearing a veil. The Scots king ripped the offending item from his daughter’s head, tearing it to pieces before trampling the garment into the earth.
Malcolm III insisted that the two girls were not destined for the religious life.
Father and daughters then returned to Scotland, only to find Queen Margaret was ailing, her health had been deteriorating gradually for some time. Despite the queen’s illness, King Malcolm took two of his sons and an army into England, raiding Northumberland. Malcolm and his eldest son, Edward, were killed. Queen Margaret was told the news just a few days later and died shortly after. Having lost both parents in such a short space of time, the two princesses were taken back south by their uncle Edgar the Ӕtheling, though whether they stayed at a convent or resided at court is unclear. Mary would eventually be married to Eustace III, Count of Boulogne, and was the mother of Matilda of Boulogne, wife of King Stephen.
Matilda herself was not short of suitors, who included Alan the Red, Count of Richmond and William de Warenne, Earl of Surrey. Orderic Vitalis explains:
Alain the Red, Count of Brittany, asked William Rufus for permission to marry Matilda, who was first called Edith, but was refused. Afterwards, William de Warenne, Earl of Surrey, asked for this princess; but reserved for another by God’s permission, she made a more illustrious marriage. Henry, having ascended the English throne, married Matilda.6
Christina of Wessex
As events unfolded, Matilda was caught up in accusations and scandal surrounding her erstwhile nunnery at Wilton. She refused to return to the convent and insisted that she had never intended to dedicate herself to the church. When Archbishop Anselm ordered Osmund, Bishop of Salisbury to retrieve this ‘prodigal daughter of the king of Scots whom the devil made to cast off the veil’, the princess stood firm and defied him.’7
William II Rufus was famously killed in a hunting accident in the New Forest on 2 August 1100, shot by an arrow loosed by Walter Tirel. William II’s youngest brother, Henry, who was among the hunting party, wasted no time grieving his brother’s death. Leaving the dead king’s body to be looked after by others, he rode fast for Winchester. He seized control of the royal treasury before heading to London and his coronation, which took place on 5 August, just three days after William II’s death. Henry’s surviving older brother, Robert, was still on his way home from the Crusades, unable to take advantage of William’s death to claim the English crown for himself. The newly crowned King Henry I now needed a wife and settled on Matilda of Scotland.
The marriage was not without controversy, however, and before it could take place the church conducted an inquiry into the suggestion that Matilda was a runaway nun. Although Matilda vehemently rejected the claim that she had been professed as a nun, the fact witnesses had seen her wearing a veil on multiple occasions counted against her. Matilda appealed to Archbishop Anselm to look into the matter. The archbishop was appalled at the thought a religious vow may have been broken and declared that he ‘would not be induced by any pleading to take from God his bride and join her to any earthly husband’.8 After meeting with Matilda personally, and hearing her side of the story, the archbishop was persuaded to call an ecclesiastical council to decide the matter. Using Archbishop Lanfranc’s previous ruling that Anglo-Saxon women who had sought refuge in a convent after the Norman Conquest ‘could not be held as sworn nuns when they emerged from hiding’, the council ruled in Matilda’s favour.9 The council determined that ‘under the circumstances of the matter, the girl could not rightly be bound by any decision to prevent her from being free to dispose of her person in whatever way she legally wished’.10
Henry I, King of England in Lincoln Cathedral’s Gallery of Kings
When the wedding finally went ahead, Archbishop Anselm related the controversy over Matilda’s status to the gathered congregation and asked if there were any objections. According to Eadmer, ‘The crowd cried out in one voice that the affair had been rightly decided and that there was no ground on which anyone … could possibly raise any scandal.’11
Henry I married Matilda of Scotland on 11 November 1100, at Westminster Abbey, her name officially and permanently changed from Edith. Marriage between Henry and Matilda represented a continuity of the old Anglo-Saxon royal line; an heir produced by the royal couple would be heir to both the Norman royal house and the ancient royal house of Wessex, creating a genuine unifying force within England. The marriage was also a union between the royal houses of England and Scotland. Offering the promise of peace on England’s troublesome northern border, it would allow Henry to look to his interests on the continent and watch for the return of his older brother, Robert, from crusade.
The honeymoon period for the royal couple was was short-lived and in 1101, Robert had returned and heard of King William’s death and Henry’s seizure of the crown. The duke sent messengers to Henry, asking him to hand over the kingdom. Henry refused. It probably came as no surprise to Henry, then, when Robert invaded England on 20 July 1101. One chronicler claimed that Matilda was in childbed at this time; if she was, the child did not survive. More likely given the timing is that the queen was having a difficult early pregnancy with Matilda, who was born seven months later.
Neither side, however, was keen on all-out war, especially a civil war, and peace talks began almost immediately as the two armies of the royal brothers came face to face at Alton. In the subsequent Treaty of Alton, the duke accepted an annuity of 3,000 marks, drawn from the revenues of England, to abandon his invasion and renounce his claims to the throne. In return, King Henry renounced his lands in Normandy save for Domfront, where he had made a solemn vow to the inhabitants that he would never relinquish control. The brothers agreed to support each other should either be attacked by a third party, and to be each other’s heir if neither sired a son.
William the Ætheling
Robert returned to Normandy but would soon be pulled back to England by a sense of chivalric duty to his barons. The agreement at Alton between the brothers had left Earl William II de Warenne isolated and at Henry’s mercy. For violating his oath of homage to the king, and for violence perpetrated by his men in Norfolk, Earl Warenne’s English estates were declared forfeit and he was effectively forced to cross the English Channel into exile. Earl William complained to Duke Robert of his sufferings and losses on the duke’s behalf. The duke obviously felt some responsibility, as he set out for England to intercede with his brother on the earl’s behalf. Robert arrived at Henry’s court, uninvited and unwelcome, in 1103. Threatened with imprisonment by an angry brother, he was persuaded by Queen Matilda, to relinquish his annuity of 3,000 marks in return for the reinstatement of Earl William’s English estates and titles.
The primary duty of a queen was to secure the succession by producing an heir as soon as she possibly could. Henry still had his older brother, Robert, to contend with and an heir would certainly strengthen his position. By September 1103, Matilda of Scotland had fulfilled this duty by giving birth to a daughter, Matilda, in February 1102, and the much-desired son and heir, William, known as William Ætheling in an allusion to his descent from the Anglo-Saxon royal line, in September 1103. It is possible third child was either stillborn or short-lived. After the births of the royal children, the king and queen appear to have lived separately, with Queen Matilda establishing herself at Westminster. It was rumoured that the queen had chosen a life of celibacy once her duties of producing an heir had been fulfilled.
The family of Henry I
Disputes with Normandy were to be a feature of the first half of Henry’s reign, even after the capture of his brother, Robert at the Battle of Tinchebrai in 1106. Robert would spend the rest of his life imprisoned in England, but his son, William Clito, would later take up the fight. And while Henry subjugated Normandy, Queen Matilda remained in England, often chairing meetings of the king’s council during his absence. The queen had her own seal, which she appended to her charters and which depicted her ‘standing, crowned and wearing a long embroidered robe which falls in folds over her feet. Over this is a seamless mantle which has an embroidered border and is draped over her head. It is fastened at her throat by a brooch, and falls in folds over her arms. In her right hand she holds a sceptre surmounted by a dove, and in her left an orb surmounted by a cross.’.12
As queen, Matilda had received a generous dower settlement, which had been granted from those lands once held by Edith, Edward the Confessor’s queen. Surviving charters issued by Matilda show that she controlled the abbeys of Waltham, Barking and Malmesbury. She held further territory in Rutland and property in London including the wharf later known as Queenhithe, and she also received the tolls of Exeter. Her staff included two clerks who would eventually become bishops. The queen appears to have had a personal interest in managing her estates. In the charter granting Waltham Abbey to his wife, Henry mentions the ‘queen’s court’ held there. Among the queen’s many good works were the building of bridges in Surrey and Essex and the construction of a public bathhouse at Queenhithe. Working with Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury, Queen Matilda founded a house for the Augustinian canons, Holy Trinity, at Aldgate in London. She also founded a leper hospital at St Giles, funded by sixty shillings a year from dock revenues at her wharf.
Leprosy and the care of lepers was of great concern to the queen. In addition to St Giles, she was the benefactress of a leper hospital at Chichester. Indeed, the queen’s brother David – later David I, King of Scots – told a tale in which he witnessed his sister administering to lepers in her own apartments in Westminster:
David I, King of Scots
The place was full of lepers and there was the Queen standing in the middle of them. And taking off a linen cloth she had wrapped around her waist, she put it into a water basin and began to wash and dry their feet and kiss them most devotedly while she was bathing them and drying them with her hands. And I said to her ‘My Lady! What are you doing? Surely if the King knew about this he would never deign to kiss you with his lips after you had been polluted by the putrefied feet of lepers!’ Then she, under a smile, said ‘Who does not know that the feet of the Eternal King are to be preferred over the lips of a King who is going to die? Surely for that reason I called you, dearest brother, so that you might learn such works from my example.13
While this story may not be an exact recollection of the siblings’ conversation, it does serve to demonstrate the extent of Matilda’s piety, something she inherited from her sainted mother, Queen Margaret. The queen’s piety and interest in religion are evidenced in her surviving correspondence, which involved not only Archbishop Anselm but also leading church figures such as Pope Paschal II, Hildebert of Lavardin, Archbishop of Tours, Herbert of Losinga, Bishop of Norwich and Ivo, Bishop of Chartres. Though written by a clerk rather than in her own hand, these letters are the earliest surviving examples from an English queen.
Matilda and Anselm appear to have had a good working relationship, which is evidenced by her actions as mediator during the Investiture Controversy, which sought to clarify the rules of investiture within the church. In their correspondence, the archbishop wrote to Matilda as his ‘dearest Lady and daughter Matilda, Queen of the English’.14 Likewise, Matilda witnessed a charter at Rochester, prior to Anselm’s exile, as ‘Matildis reginae et filiae Anselmi archiepiscopi’ (Queen Matilda and daughter of Archbishop Anselm).15 And when Anselm was exiled from England from 1103, Queen Matilda acted as mediator between the archbishop, the king and the pope, Paschal II.
Empress Matilda depicted in an image from the Gospels of Henry the Lion.
The queen appears to have been well aware of her influence over the king, and its limitations. When Henry appropriated the revenues of Canterbury for himself, claiming it was a vacant see with the archbishop in exile, Matilda persuaded him to set aside a personal allowance for Anselm. However, when she was asked to intervene with the king a few years later, when he was attempting to extract more money from the clergy, Matilda ‘wept and insisted she could do nothing’.16 In 1104, Matilda even approached Pope Paschal II, asking for his intervention in the disagreement between Henry and Anselm.
Henry saw the investiture crisis as an erosion of his royal prerogative, and he was determined to cede no ground. But, with the pope threatening excommunication and Matilda voicing her own pleas to her husband, a compromise was eventually reached by which Henry would relinquish his powers to invest prelates but retain the right to receive homage for ‘temporalities’; this latter concession by the church would augment the secular powers of the crown. When Anselm was finally able to return home to England, in 1106, Matilda was there to personally welcome him back from his three-year exile. She then rode in advance of the archbishop, to ensure accommodation and welcoming ceremonies were in place along his route.
The Investiture Controversy served to demonstrate the extent to which Matilda’s influence could be exerted, not only on the king but internationally, through her correspondence with the church’s most powerful prelates. Matilda also acted as regent for Henry when he was away in Normandy, which was more than half of the time. A woman fulfilling such a role in her lord’s absence was far from unusual and indeed was accepted by the barony of the kingdom; Matilda’s daughter, Empress Matilda, would discover that a woman fulfilling this role on her own behalf faced far more resistance. Queen Matilda acted as regent for months at a time, most notably for ten-month spells from September 1114 and from April 1116. In her final regency Matilda was assisted by her only son, the teenage William Ætheling, who was now earnestly in training for his future role as King of England. He would later join his father in Normandy to continue his apprenticeship, fighting in his first battle there in 1119.
Another notable element of queenship was patronage. Queen Matilda commissioned William of Malmesbury to write the Gesta Regum Anglorum, a genealogical history of the royal house of Wessex which was finished after her death and presented to her daughter, Empress Matilda. She also commissioned a biography of her mother, The Life of St Margaret Queen of Scotland by Turgot, Prior of Durham and later Bishop of St Andrew’s, who had been her mother’s confessor. In 1111 the queen attended the ceremony for the translation of St Æthelwold’s relics at Winchester, and the following year she was in Gloucester to witness the presentation of gifts to the monks there.
Seal of Queen Matilda
Matilda was also concerned with justice and in 1116 ordered the release of Bricstan of Chatteris, a prisoner who had apparently been unjustly condemned. Bricstan, who had intended to take holy orders before his arrest – the reason for which is unknown – called upon St Benedict and St Etheldreda for assistance. The two saints are said to have torn his chains from him. The shocked guards immediately turned to Queen Matilda, who ordered an investigation into the events. Satisfied that a miracle had occurred, the queen ordered Bricstans’s immediate release. She also ordered that special masses should be heard, and the bells of London should be rung in celebration.
Matilda of Scotland died on 1 May 1118 at Westminster, at the age of thirty-seven. King Henry was in Normandy at the time and Matilda was acting as regent, which suggests that her death was unexpected, though we do not know the cause. The canons of her foundation of Holy Trinity at Aldgate and the monks at Westminster both claimed the right to bury her. She was buried in Westminster Abbey, much to the chagrin of the monks of Aldgate who lodged a complaint with Henry on his return. Henry compensated the order with a gift of relics from the Byzantine emperor. He also confirmed his queen’s donations to Holy Trinity, Aldgate. The king gave money so that a perpetual light could be maintained at her tomb; this was still being paid in the reign of Henry III, Matilda’s great-great-grandson.
Matilda died a beloved queen, and was remembered as ‘Mold the Good Queen’ or ‘Good Queen Maud’. Praise for the queen is almost universal, although William of Malmesbury criticised her for patronising foreigners and reported that she ‘fell into the error of prodigal givers; bringing many claims to her tenantry, exposing them to injuries and taking away their property, but since she became known as a liberal benefactress, she scarcely regarded their outrage’.17
The Warenne Chronicle recorded her death with a fitting epitaph:
Matilda of Scotland
So then, almost all of England’s bishops, magnates, abbots, priors, and indeed the innumerable common masses assembled with great sadness for her crowded funeral, and with many tears they attended her burial … I can sum up her praise in this brief declaration that from the time when England was first subject to kings, of all queens none was found like her, nor will a similar queen be found in coming ages whose memory will be held in praise and whose name will be blessed for centuries. So great was the sorrow at her absence and so great a devotion filled everyone, that several of the noblest clerics, whom she had much esteemed in life, stayed at her tomb for thirty days in vigils, prayers and fasting, and they kept mournful and devoted watch…18
A woman of proven ability in governing the kingdom, Queen Matilda served as an example of what a woman could do, and the power she could wield, albeit in her husband’s name.
*
Notes:
1. Lisa Hilton, Queens Consort: England’s Medieval Queens; 2. Eadmer of Canterbury, Historia Novorum in Anglia; 3. Hilton, Queens Consort; 4. ibid; 5. Michael Swanton (ed.), The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles; 6. Ordericus Vitalis, Histoire de Normandie, quatrième partie (my translation); 7. Anselm, quoted in Hilton, Queens Consort; 8. Eadmer, Historia Novorum in Anglia; 9. Hilton, Queens Consort; 10. Eadmer, Historia Novorum in Anglia; 11. ibid; 12. Susan M. Johns, Noblewomen, Aristocracy and Power in the Twelfth-Century Anglo-Norman Realm; 13. Ailred of Rievaulx, quoted in Hilton, Queens Consort; 14. epistolae.ccnmtl.columbia.edu; 15. Hilton, Queens Consort; 16. ibid; 17. William of Malmesbury, quoted in Hilton, Queens Consort; 18. Van Houts and Love, The Warenne (Hyde) Chronicle
Lisa Hilton, Queens Consort: England’s Medieval Queens; Eadmer of Canterbury, Historia Novorum in Anglia; Michael Swanton (ed.), The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles; Ordericus Vitalis, Histoire de Normandie; Susan M. Johns, Noblewomen, Aristocracy and Power in the Twelfth-Century Anglo-Norman Realm; epistolae.ccnmtl.columbia.edu; Teresa Cole, After the Conquest: The Divided Realm; Jeffrey James, The Bastard’s Sons: Robert, William and Henry of Normandy; Henry of Huntingdon, The History of the English People 1000-1154; Charles Spencer, The White Ship: Conquest, Anarchy and the Wrecking of Henry I’s Dream; E. Norton, England’s Queens: From Boudicca to Elizabeth of York; Nigel Tranter, The Story of Scotland; Elisabeth Van Houts, and Rosalind C. Love (eds and trans), The Warenne (Hyde) Chronicle; Oxford Dictionary of National Biography; Ordericus Vitalis, The Ecclesiastical History of Orderic Vitalis, 1075-1143; J. F. Andrews, Lost Heirs of the Medieval Crown: The Kings and Queens Who Never Were; Anne Crawford (ed.), Letters of the Queens of England; Elizabeth Norton, England’s Queens: From Boudicca to Elizabeth of York; Lida Sophia Townsley, ‘Twelfth-century English queens: charters and authority’, academia.edu;
*
My Books
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
Today, it is a pleasure to welcome Susan Abernethy back to History… the Interesting Bits, to chat about her fabulous new book, The Formidable Women Who Shaped Medieval Europe: Power and Patronage at the Burgundian Court.
How I Decided to Write The Formidable Women Who Shaped Medieval Europe: Power and Patronage at the Burgundian Court
It all started with the random purchase of a used copy of a biography of Isabel of Portugal by Aline S Taylor. It just so happened that Isabel was the daughter of King John I of Portugal and Philippa, daughter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster and son of King Edward III of England. To my surprise, Isabel was married, at the venerable age of 33, to Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy as his third wife. At the time, I had no idea who Philip was and knew nothing about the duchy of Burgundy.
Isabel had a son who succeeded his father with the moniker of Charles the Bold. It turned out I owned a reprint of a turn of the century biography of Charles by Ruth Putnam in my library. Both Isabel and Charles greatly intrigued me as tenacious and resolute characters. I had to learn more. My research began with Putnam’s biography and progressed to the four volume biographies of each of the Valois dukes of Burgundy by Richard Vaughan.
As my knowledge of Burgundian history expanded, more women in history emerged. From the wives, daughters, grand-daughters and nieces, they were all used as pawns in the dukes’ diplomatic efforts to expand as well as govern the Burgundian Empire. The dukes could not have amassed their empire, the size of England and Wales combined, without their women. Some of these women lived lives of comfort and supreme authority while others were relentlessly bullied and badgered into surrendering their patrimony. This book is a collection of thirty-one of these women, related to the Valois dukes by blood, marriage and politics.
Isabel of Portugal
Many of them had a major role in the history of Western Europe, spreading their influence across numerous countries, including France, Germany, England, the Low Countries, Italy, Spain and many more. The first chapter of the book is a concise summary of how the Valois dukes grew their empire, beginning with the death of the Philip I, the last duke of the House of Burgundy. With his death, the duchy of Burgundy reverted to the French crown, and it was up to King John II of France to determine its fate. John had a younger son, Philip, who had distinguished himself as a fighter during the Hundred Years’ War.
As a reward for his faithful service, his father gave him the duchy of Touraine. Philip would later trade this small principality for the more prestigious duchy of Burgundy in 1363. He had a long-time dream of merging his new duchy to the county of Burgundy, otherwise known as the Franche-Comté and to do this, he needed to marry the heiress. So in the summer of 1369, he married Margaret of Male, who stood to inherit not just the Franche-Comté, but also Flanders and the counties of Rethel and Nevers, along with other territories.
So we have the first formidable woman, Margaret of Male, who not only gave birth to many children but aided her husband in ruling his newly acquired conglomeration of territories. Philip the Bold instituted a deliberate program of marrying his daughters into various regions around his provinces, not just as respectable mates for the grooms but to increase his territories. Richard Vaughan says Philip the Bold was one of the most talented diplomats of his age.
Margaret of Male
Two of Margaret’s daughters were exceedingly influential but for different reasons. One of my favorite discoveries in writing this book was Catherine of Burgundy, Duchess of Austria and Countess of Ferrette. Philip had is eye on the county of Ferrette (now a part of Alsace in northeastern France), which was under the influence of Leopold IV, Duke of Austria. Catherine’s marriage to Leopold would be a success in that the couple got along well; however, they had no children. When Philip the Bold failed to pay Catherine’s dowry she convinced Leopold to grant her the governance of the county of Ferrette which would give her an income.
She ruled the county competently, acting as a diplomat for her Burgundian ducal brother and nephew, John the Fearless and Philip the Good respectively, making economic and trade alliances and waging petty wars in the surrounding area. Catherine is one of the few women I’ve found who operated as a man would have in the medieval era which makes her pretty unique. Even more exceptionally, once Catherine became a widow, she married a handsome young nobleman without her brother’s permission, to the astonishment of just about everyone around her. She certainly must have been charming and persuasive.
Catherine’s sister Mary married Amadeus VIII, Duke of Savoy in the spring of 1401 but did not arrive in her new home until September 1403. Mary and Amadeus had many children, the most influential being their son Louis, who succeeded his father as duke of Savoy in 1440. He married Anne of Cyprus and together they had about nineteen children. Mary of Burgundy’s legacy lies among these grandchildren.
Catherine of Burgundy
Louis and Anne of Cyprus’ eldest son, Amadeus IX, married Yolande of France, the daughter of King Charles VII and Marie of Anjou. Yolande’s story looms large as one of the formidable women in the book. At the age of two, she left France to live in Savoy to be educated and to learn the language and customs of her new home. Her husband died young from various congenital ailments and Yolande acted as regent for her son during his minority.
As the leader of her country, Yolande became entangled in the web of the Spider King, her brother Louis XI of France and his mortal enemy, Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy as well as her numerous brothers-in-law and the crafty Duke of Milan. With authority and finesse, Yolande navigated these treacherous times. The intrepid Yolande would be captured and held captive twice along with her children. In both cases, she made brave and daring escapes.
Louis and Anne of Cyprus had two other daughters who made their mark in history. At one time, the English monarch Edward IV considered Bona of Savoy as a wife. The negotiations stalled when Edward married the enchanting Elizabeth Woodville in 1464. By 1468, negotiations for her marriage to Galeazzo Maria Sforza, Duke of Milan were completed. Bona immediately gave birth to an heir and spare and modelled the perfect Italian Renaissance wife as her husband descended into paranoia and mental illness.
Bona of Savoy
When Galeazzo Maria was assassinated in 1476, Bona acted as regent for her minor son. At first, she met with great success but eventually she ran into trouble with her brother-in-law, Ludovico Sforza, who wrested power from her, forcing her to struggle for the rest of her life with being separated from her children and inconsistent income.
Bona’s sister Charlotte of Savoy married the Spider King Louis XI of France when she was nine years old and Louis twenty-seven. Of course, the marriage was not consummated until Charlotte came of age and she had three remarkable children. Her son would succeed his father in 1483 as King Charles VIII. Her daughter Anne of France, Duchess of Bourbon acted as regent for her minor brother for eight years and steered France through several crises.
Anne’s greatest achievement would be the annexation to France of the significant duchy of Brittany, one of her lifelong dreams, when her brother married the Breton duchess, Anne. Charlotte’s youngest daughter, Jeanne, born with several severe disabilities, would eventually become Queen of France as the wife of King Louis XII. The marriage would be extremely unhappy, and Louis XII did all in his power to obtain a divorce. After numerous attempts and following the payment of an enormous bribe to Pope Alexander VI, he obtained his annulment, and Louis XII married the widowed queen, Anne of Brittany.
Jeanne of France
King Louis made sure Jeanne had abundant properties to guarantee a steady and ample income. Jeanne had a lifelong dream of living a monastic life. She used her funds to successfully build a convent and found a monastic order in Bourges. Her Order of the Virgin Mary, dedicated to the Renunciation, was so successful, it is still in existence to this day in monasteries in France, Belgium, Poland, Costa Rica, Guatemala and Africa. Jeanne was canonized in May 1950.
These and other stories of courageous, intelligent, audacious and fearless women populate this book. Some of the relationships between the women are complex so included in the back of the book are several family trees that illustrate their associations. We are lucky enough to have numerous portraits of most of the women in the collection and these are included in the plate section. My purpose in writing the book is to feature these women and shed light on the history of the Burgundian Empire.
Susan’s passion for history dates back fifty years and led her to study for a Bachelor of Arts degree in history at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She is currently a member of the Rocky Mountain Medieval and Renaissance Association, the Society for Renaissance Studies, The Historical Writers Association, and the Historical Association. Her work has appeared on several historical websites and in magazines and includes guest appearances on historical podcasts. Her blog, The Freelance History Writer, has continuously published over five hundred historical articles since 2012, with an emphasis on European, Tudor, Medieval, Renaissance, Early Modern and women’s history. She is currently working on her third non-fiction book.
*
My Books:
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
It is time for another edition of Wordly Women! And today I am chatting with an author who, like me, likes to bring historical female characters to the fore, from the early medieval to the Tudors. She has also written a fabulous trilogy on Henry VIII himself. Judith Arnopp writes both historical fiction and non-fiction and has a wonderful back catalogue for you to explore, if you have not discovered her yet. Judith is also one of those authors who is happy to share her experiences with readers and writers alike.
Hello Judith! Welcome!
Sharon: What got you into writing?
Judith: It was so long ago now I barely remember. I have always written stories, as a child I wrote things to read to my dolls who were always very appreciative. When I was about fourteen I wrote a torrid romance featuring a heroine called Rosalind and a hero named Tybalt – I bet you can’t guess where the inspiration for those names came from – lol. My best friend used to come round every evening to hear the next chapter and there’d be hell to pay if it wasn’t ready. I’d love to get my hands on it now. I bet it was dreadful!
When marriage and children came along I still managed to write stories but now they featured my kids who loved listening to themselves having adventures. It wasn’t until my daughter and three sons had grown old enough not to need me 24/7 that I enrolled at the University of Wales and did a degree in English literature and Creative Writing. I loved it so much I stayed on to do a masters in Medieval History. I would have liked to remain at uni forever but one has to leave eventually and find a proper job.
At that time, we lived on a rural smallholding, far from town and suitable jobs were few so it made sense to concentrate on what I loved and what I was reasonably good at. Historical fiction was the obvious choice and luckily the internet, which was relatively new then, made easing myself into the book world achievable, even from the wilds of Wales. There were great online groups then, like You Write On where I encountered other authors, most of whom I am still in touch with today.
Sharon: Tell us about your books.
Judith: My first published novel was Peaceweaver; the story of Eadgyth, who was consort to both Gruffydd ap Llewellyn of Wales and Harold II of England. In the recent TV debacle, King and Conqueror, they renamed her Margaret for some reason and she played a much larger role in Harold’s story. My book is set in the years leading up to the Norman Conquest, culminating just after the Battle of Hastings.
A further two novels followed, The Forest Dwellers, set in the New forest after the invasion and another, The Song of Heledd, set in 7th century Powys. My early books barely made a ripple and sales were slow but people constantly asked me if I had written anything ‘Tudor’ – in the end, I caved in and wrote The Winchester Goose. That was the jumping off point really and I spent the next few years writing about Henry VIII’s queens, The Kiss of the Concubine, the story of Anne Boleyn, Intractable Heart, the story of Katheryn Parr, and was about Henry’s daughter, Mary. Once I’d written them I began to wonder if I was ready to tackle Henry himself.
Henry VIII is a huge undertaking. He had already cropped up in most of my books, The Beaufort Chronicle which is about his grandmother Margaret Beaufort, and A Song of Sixpence which is about his mother, Elizabeth of York. During the course of skirting around the king, I realised how few books there are that look at the events from his perspective. I knew it was time to stop being afraid, and just do it.
The four years it took me to write the trilogy were hard. I know it sounds silly but Henry figured so largely in my head that he became real and as I neared his later years, it became really difficult to live in such close proximity.
The trilogy is written in Henry’s voice. I imagined him sitting with me in my office as he related his story. Sometimes he would grow so indignant, so angry, so defensive that I forgot it was simply fiction.
Henry always had the perfect excuse and if he began to feel uncomfortable while making a confession he either grew angry and stormed out or just lied. He was a very unreliable narrator, which is something I love in other people’s books and it was fun to use the device in my own work. It is up to the reader to decide how much of his revelation is truth, and how much is gloss.
But somehow, particularly as I neared the end, I was able to empathise with him. I acknowledged his many sins but I had also come to a better understanding of what drove him. I wouldn’t say I pitied him exactly but I came to regret how his life unfolded. He could have been a great king.
Sharon: What attracts you to the Tudor period?
Judith: I think it is the intrigue, the uncertainty, the politics, the unacknowledged fear that everyone walked in. And then, of course, there are the fabulous clothes. When the reenactment group was still running I used to make heaps of Tudor gowns for when I played Mary I, and doublets and gowns for my husband who played Norfolk. Ill health has forced us to stop that for a while but I’d like to do it again. With a gown like that hanging in the wardrobe, it’s a shame not to.
We know so much about the reign of Henry VIII yet there are still so many questions that will never be answered. Nobody seemed to learn from past mistakes. After the plight of Anne Boleyn, why oh why did Katherine Howard play fast and loose with the king; and what was Jane Rochford thinking to encourage the queen in such a dangerous game?
I’d like to travel back in time to visit the Tudor court to find the answers, but not as a person, I value my head too much. Perhaps I could be a bird in the rafters of the great hall, or a fly on the bedchamber wall. Or maybe one of Henry’s beloved spaniels so I could listen in while he fondled my ears – that would be safer!
Sharon: Who is your favourite Tudor and why?
Judith: It is close between Margaret Beaufort or Henry VIII. I seem to be drawn to the historical figures who are regarded as ‘baddies’ but I am always puzzled by Margaret’s bad reputation. She was strong, brave, determined and loyal yet many people are convinced she was involved in the disappearance of the princes. Online arguments can be quite heated but I don’t join in. There is little point growing hot and bothered over a supposed crime with no evidence or even the certainty that foul play even took place. It would be totally out of character for Margaret, a pious woman of unblemished reputation to resort to infanticide. I disregard the theory yet remain totally fascinated. I do have my own ideas but like everyone else’s there is no evidence.
As to why Henry is one of my favourite Tudors, I guess I already answered that in the last question but I will try to sum it up.
If you put aside the fact of his crimes and focus on his motives, he becomes rather more understandable. I often wonder what I would have done were I in his shoes. To understand him we must put aside all modern opinion and look at it entirely from the perspective of a 16th century king.
He was unexpectedly thrust into kingship. He was raised to believe that as king his will was akin to God’s. It was drummed into him that a king’s first and only duty was to produce an heir, and protect the dynasty. He knew from the experience of losing his elder brother that one son was not enough for a king. In his youth, Henry excelled at everything, from wrestling and jousting to poetry and music. To fail was unthinkable and when he began to recognise he was not fulfilling expectations, it was unbearable. Time was running out, Katherine of Aragon was no longer fertile so he kicked out like an angry toddler and in doing so destroyed his wives, his oldest friends, his mentors, and he ultimately destroyed himself and his shining, unspotted image.
Many people hate Henry and I do not in any way admire him but he is nonetheless fascinating.
Sharon: Who is your least favourite Tudor and why?
Judith: I hate to say it but I think it is Jane Seymour. Not because of modern day perceptions of her as a home wrecker but simply because unlike the other queens, she does not emerge from the historical record as a fully rounded character. Even though she is often regarded as Henry’s greatest love, it is quite likely he would have moved on if he’d had time to grow tired of her. She is a bit yawny. The only extant historic item to provide a glimmer of her inner self is her splendid portrait. (which incidentally is on the cover of my non-fiction book about Tudor clothing, How to Dress Like A Tudor.)
Jane seems quite plain to our eyes, chubby face, cheesy-green skin tone which probably has more to do with the age of the painting than Jane herself. I suppose, after Anne, anyone would seem dull and we shouldn’t really compare them. If she’d had longer to make a personal dent in history I am sure I would feel differently but the only time I have felt a spark of interest in her is Hilary Mantel’s portrayal in Bring Out the Bodies. But that is fiction and Hilary was a genius.
Sharon: How do you approach researching your topic?
Judith: I’ve been researching in one way or another for donkey’s years but it wasn’t until I went to uni that I learned how to do it properly. I’ve been writing in roughly the same era for so long that I no longer need to research as deeply I used to. When I first began I had to know everything about Tudor life, customs, clothing, diet, housing, social niceties but now it is more a case of refreshing my knowledge. I usually write in the first person and I make a point of reading several different biographies of my subject, both contemporary and modern accounts to get a rounded picture.
As I said previously, I usually opt for ‘difficult’ characters so I read both sides of the matter, question everything and make a timeline of their lives, marking where they were and when so I can follow as close as possible in their footsteps.
But I always bear in mind that both primary and secondary accounts will be biased one way or another. There are very few first-person historical accounts (Oh how I’d love a secret diary of Margaret Beaufort to be discovered) so I can only surmise their inner thoughts by careful study of recorded reactions to events.
For instance, the death of Katherine and Henry’s children. We always hear how dreadful it must have been for her to watch her offspring die, and indeed it must have been. But they were Henry’s children too. His devastation must have been equal to Katherine’s. His grief would have matched his anger at God for depriving him of an heir. Of course, he hid it, he was very proud but I can imagine the death of each child increased his already burgeoning terror that he might fail to beget a son.
But sorry, I digress. Once I have sketched the outline of the story, I put aside the huge pile of research books I’ve accumulated and let my imagination take over. During the revision process I frequently return to my research to see where or if I have diverted – sometimes I correct it, but if it adds to the drama I don’t delete the scene but I make a note of the diversion in the authors’ note.
Sharon: Tell us your ‘favourite’ Wars of the Roses story you have come across in your research.
Judith: I’ve read historical fiction since I was a girl. I always sided with York (don’t shoot me!) and enjoyed books that portrayed women like Maguerite of Anjou and Margaret Beaufort as evil intentioned. Until relatively recently, any woman that stepped from her prescribed role was viewed negatively. As a young girl I never even questioned it but these days I am more neutral. I am old enough to realise that evil is in the eye of the beholder and things just aren’t black and white.
I still enjoy books set in the era but I no longer take up arms. As in any conflict there is good and bad on both sides.
It wasn’t until I began to read in this unbiased way that I even considered questioning Marguerite of Anjou’s portrayal in both fiction and non-fiction. She really wasn’t liked then and neither is she now. Shakespeare didn’t help by naming her as the ‘she-wolf’. But when you consider the whole York/Lancaster war from her point of view, the story changes.
She is an anointed queen, her incompetent husband goes a bit crazy, York comes strutting into court demanding to be regent when she has proven herself perfectly capable in the role but, of course, she is a woman, and a French woman at that! York then names her child illegitimate and somehow has him ousted from succession.
It is no wonder she was miffed!
Marguerite fought valiantly and tirelessly for her son’s rights until his death at Tewkesbury and there was nothing left to fight for. I rather admire that. Ok, some atrocities were carried out in her name, her ungoverned armies won her few friends but York and his contemporaries also carried out atrocious acts. The murder of Henry VI by Edward IV, the drowning of Clarence in the Tower. I could provide more examples.
Atrocities happen in war.
The injustices heaped upon Marguerite, coupled with the slurs that are still being spoken against her today inspired me to write her story but do not worry, I have not turned her into a saint. In my book, Marguerite: Hell Hath No Fury! you will encounter a young French girl who arrives in England to marry the king as part of the peace process at the end of the hundred years war. She is hated and reviled as a ‘foreigner’ from the start, saddled with an incompetent king, expected to produce an heir yet when she does, they name her an adulteress and her son a bastard.
As the long fight for justice continues, she is often rash, ungoverned, unwise. She grows angrier, and toward the end perhaps a little mad, but she fights tirelessly until she has nothing left worth fighting for. In judging Marguerite we should use the same rules as when judging her male counterparts.
Sharon: Tell us your least ‘favourite’ Wars of the Roses story you have come across in your research.
Judith: I don’t really have a ‘least favourite’. As a historian I try to remain objective so I am not squeamish when it comes to the murders and betrayal. If anything, the worse the story is, the more fascinating I find it.
It is important, imperative even, to view events from the perspective of the era. I am always impatient to hear Edmund Tudor derided as a child molester because of Margaret’s age when Henry VII was conceived. It may have raised a few eyebrows at the time but there is nothing in the record to suggest she was unwilling. Margaret was not alone, it was not unheard of and other women of the era also married and gave birth at a young age. Margaret always looked kindly on Edmund and in her will, requested to be buried with him rather than any of her other spouses. Her request was ignored and she lies in splendour at Westminster Abbey but her wish to be with Edmund suggests to me that she thought well of him and held no grudge, so why should we?
I try to keep a neutral opinion until the times comes to start writing and assume the persona of my chosen subject. As far as I am concerned, the more shocking the event, the better.
I am often so consumed by the subject of my novel that it prevents me from sleeping. The characters linger in my head for long after I’ve published and Henry has been the worst one for that. It is getting on for three years since the final volume of The Henrician Chronicle was published and he is still lurking but then, I guess it is to be expected as he always was an attention seeker.
Sharon: Are there any other eras you would like to write about?
Judith: Most of my books are set in transitional periods. I began my career writing about the Norman invasion, focusing on the problems regime changes bring. I covered the dissolution of the monasteries and the Reformation in Sisters of Arden, an era that was also life changing to the people of England. The war of the roses is similarly ‘transitional’ and there are still historical figures I’ve not yet covered. I quite fancy the glorious revolution and I’ve read a lot of novels set in and around WWI and WWII but I am too old now to carry out the research required to write in that era. It will be better to stick where I am, safe in the very dangerous world that I know.
Sharon: What are you working on now?
Judith: Marguerite: Hell Hath No Fury! was only published a short time ago and I am supposed to taking a few months off to rest. However, I have begun to play with something else. I have written a few chapters but am still finding my feet. Rather like The Book of Thornhold that jumps through several eras of history, it is about a place, rather than any particular period. The focus is on the history of the building, the people who lived there and the events that left a mark. Layers of history that build a transparency of events that shaped the building into what it is today. This of course, makes for a lot of research and the resulting book will be very hard to market but I’ve always been a glutton for punishment.
Sharon: And finally, what is the best thing about being a writer?
Judith: Oh, now there’s a question. It is very hard being a writer just now. It is all very fine when sitting in my own home, losing myself in time while tapping out fabulous stories but in recent years, marketing has become a living nightmare!
When I first began, around 2004, it was fun but now my mailbox in overflowing with faux promoters, faux publishers, tic-tockers, all demanding money for promises they either cannot fulfil or have no intention of delivering. It is no longer possible to know who to trust. There is also AI to deal with – a constant battle … AI stole our intellectual property for training purposes and is now putting the authors it stole from, and illustrators out of work … but I will leave it there, you asked what the best thing is…
For me it is the camaraderie with fellow authors, the mutual support, the back slapping, the advice, the encouragement. We may never meet face to face but authors understand things that non-writers can’t. I couldn’t do without them and neither could I continue to work without my readers. I appreciate every reader who takes the time to email to say how much they enjoy my work, the ones who go the extra mile of leaving a wonderful review or recommend my books to others. Like most authors, I need constant reassurance that I am doing ok. When the praise stops, the words falter and I am in danger of wandering away from my desk.
I am solitary by nature and writing is a lonely place but it pleases me to look up from my work and rediscover the wonderful view from my house that looks over Cardigan Bay. I save the few thousand words I have added to my wip, close my laptop and spend the rest of the day either gardening or walking on the beach or restoring my antique doll’s houses. Sometimes it is hard to believe that this is my job – I’ve no lengthy commute, no office clique to deal with, no rules. I may not be a big-name author but I love writing and I love my readers, and judging from their emails, they love me in return. I am grateful that they buy my books and keep me from penury. I am the author of my own life and that is just perfect.
About the Author:
Judith Arnopp’s novels are set during the War of the Roses and the Tudor era. They focus on women like Margaret Beaufort, Anne Neville, Elizabeth of York, Anne Boleyn, and Mary Tudor.
She has a Master’s degree in medieval studies and a BA in English and creative writing from the University of Wales, making Historical Fiction the obvious career choice. She lives on the coast of West Wales with her husband, John, and now her family have flown the nest she writes full time from her home overlooking Cardigan Bay. Her early books were set in the Anglo-Saxon period but since switching to the Wars of the roses and Tudor era her career has flourished and she now has a substantial collection of titles in her catalogue. All books are available on Kindle and in paperback, some are on Audible.
Judith also writes non-fiction, her most recent published by Pen and Sword is a study of Tudor clothing and fashion, How to Dress Like a Tudor. Her work features in several anthologies and magazines.
She runs a small seaside holiday let in Aberporth and when she has time for fun, likes to garden and restore antique doll’s houses. You can find her on most social media platforms.
Her novels include:
A Daughter of Warwick: the story of Anne Neville, Queen of Richard III; Marguerite: Hell Hath No Fury! the story of Marguerite of Anjou; A Song of Sixpence: the story of Elizabeth of York; The Beaufort Chronicle: the life of Lady Margaret Beaufort (three book series); A Matter of Conscience: Henry VIII, the Aragon Years (Book One of The Henrician Chronicle); A Matter of Faith: Henry VIII, the Days of the Phoenix (Book Two of The Henrician Chronicle); A Matter of Time: Henry VIII, the Dying of the Light (Book Three of The Henrician Chronicle); The Kiss of the Concubine: a story of Anne Boleyn; Sisters of Arden: on the Pilgrimage of Grace; The Winchester Goose: at the court of Henry VIII; Intractable Heart: the story of Katheryn Parr; The Heretic Wind: the life of Mary Tudor, Queen of England; Peaceweaver; The Forest Dwellers; The Song of Heledd; The Book of Thornhold
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
Hunlaf risks the wrath of the mighty Byzantine Empire on a dangerous voyage to the Holy Land. A rip-roaring Viking-era adventure from the author of the Bernicia Chronicles. ‘Extremely satisfying and rewarding, Dominion of Dust rampages across the page with slicing action’ LoveReading
AD 797, Cyprus. Warrior-monk Hunlaf and his crew are on a voyage to acquire an important Christian relic before it falls into the hands of Byzantium’s scheming Empress Eirene.
Hunlaf’s crew receive unexpected help as they seek their treasure, but soon find themselves betrayed. About to leave for home empty-handed, the adventurers instead sail further east: to Jerusalem, the Holy Land, abundant in relics.
And dangerous intrigues.
Hunlaf and his friends will face a deadly race against time as they attempt to secure a holy treasure, outwit Byzantium’s zealous agents, and avoid grisly deaths at the hands of the local rulers.
What I like about Matthew Harffy’s books is that you never know what is going to happen. Knowing the hero doesn’t always win means you are kept on the edge of your seat throughout.
Dominion of Dust is a spectacular adventure that pits West against East.
The 4th instalment in Harffy’s A Time of Swordsseries takes us from the court of Charlemagne, through Cyprus to Jerusalem itself, in the search for Holy relics. And because it is Hunlaf, danger is never far away. From agents of Byzantium, to enemies made along the way, people want Hunlaf and his friends to fail and – preferably – die.
But don’t get too attached to any of the characters – Matthew Harffy is not averse to killing off your favourite. But the, that’s what he does. He makes you, the reader, care about his characters. They jump off the page and play with your emotions. You feel their pain (and they’re warriors, so there’s a lot of pain).
Matthew Harffy’s writing style is engaging from the very beginning, immersing you in the story, the period and the landscape! You can practically feel the sand between your toes.
I pulled my fingers back quickly, frightened at what might be hidden inside the coffer. But there was no movement in the box’s interior, just the dusty, crumbling remains of what looked like a silk-covered pillow. Atop that pillow, dull with the grime of centuries, rested the blade of a spear. The metal was dark and I wondered whether it might be stained with the very blood of Christ. Or perhaps it was simply iron-rot, the red dust of age that smeared and pitted the surface of the relic. Whatever caused the dark hue of the metal, there could be no doubt that this was the item Ahlwin had sent us after.
The others crowded forward, trying to peer into the coffer. But I knew from their positions they would not be able to make out what I was looking at. Mine were the first eyes in generations to contemplate the relic. That sudden realisation made me giddy. I held out my hand above the metal, imagining for a moment that I could feel something akin to heat shimmering from it, a murmuring tremor in the air, testament to its immense power.
Unbreathing, I took hold of the relic, and lifted it up, turning towards the others so that they all might see this thing of wonder.
“Behold,” I said, my voice catching, ” the Spear of Longinus.”
Of course, it was not the spear, merely its metal head, and it measured no more than two hand’s lengths. I had expected it to be hot, or somehow pulsing with its holy power, but it was cool to the touch and I felt no jolt of energy. It was just a piece of old metal.
In Dominion of Dust Matthew Harffy is an equal opportunities author. Two of the villains are particularly despicable – and they’re women! And, of course, Hunlaf has a habit of making enemies, so there’s more than one set of bad guys to contend with. And this is Hunlaf’s story. Headed to the Holy Land in search of the greatest of relics for Charlemagne, Hunlaf hopes to visit the sites associated with Christ himself, and to tread the same streets He did. Though, knowing his luck, you may not be surprised that he has to race through some of those streets to escape pursuers!
Matthew Harffy is the master of adventure storytelling. And with the hunt for relics, Dominion of Dust has the feel of an Indiana Jones movie – only set 1,000 years earlier. Only Hunlaf isn’t crossing swords with Nazis, he’s fighting the agents of Byzantium. The story is woven around the greatest relics of Christendom and the competition between Charlemagne and Empress Irene to take possession of them. Though, fiction, Dominion of Dust has its origins in historical fact; the desire to possess religious relics and the belief in their divine power was a part of medieval life.
And there are some surprises in this one. Matthew Harffy has taken care to include the wildlife. The story of Abul-Abbas, the elephant gifted to Charlemagne, may be fantastical, but it is true. And he has a surprising part in the story. As does a rather vicious, relentless and determined lion, reminding us that not all predators are human!
Dominion of Dust is a wonderful, exciting adventure that any fan of Indiana Jones will want to read. There is action in abundance; treasure maps, despicable enemies and secret passages are all part of one incredible story.
Matthew Harffy lived in Northumberland as a child and the area had a great impact on him. The rugged terrain, ruined castles and rocky coastline made it easy to imagine the past. Decades later, a documentary about Northumbria’s Golden Age sowed the kernel of an idea for a series of historical fiction novels. The first of them is the action-packed tale of vengeance and coming of age, The Serpent Sword.
Matthew has worked in the IT industry, where he spent all day writing and editing, just not the words that most interested him. Prior to that he worked in Spain as an English teacher and translator. Matthew lives in Wiltshire, England, with his wife and their two daughters.
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Elizabeth Chadwick, Helen Castor, Ian Mortimer, Scott Mariani and Bernard Cornwell and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved. And Matthew Harffy himself will be on a forthcoming episode. An old friend of the podcast, Matthew joined us on one of our very first episodes to talk about the Saxons.
The author of The King’s Mistress (U.S. title The September Queen) explores Tudor England with the tale of Bess of Hardwick—the formidable four-time widowed Tudor dynast who became one of the most powerful women in the history of England.
On her twelfth birthday, Bess of Hardwick receives the news that she is to be a waiting gentlewoman in the household of Lady Zouche. Armed with nothing but her razor-sharp wit and fetching looks, Bess is terrified of leaving home. But as her family has neither the money nor the connections to find her a good husband, she must go to facilitate her rise in society.
When Bess arrives at the glamorous court of King Henry VIII, she is thrust into a treacherous world of politics and intrigue, a world she must quickly learn to navigate. The gruesome fates of Henry’s wives convince Bess that marrying is a dangerous business. Even so, she finds the courage to wed not once, but four times. Bess outlives one husband, then another, securing her status as a woman of property. But it is when she is widowed a third time that she is left with a large fortune and even larger decisions—discovering that, for a woman of substance, the power and the possibilities are endless . . .
Venus in Winter by Gillian Bagwell transports you to Tudor England.
In her novel, Venus in Winter, Gillian Bagwell tells the story of the early years of one of my favourite Tudor heroines, Bess of Hardwick. Gillian follows Bess’s life from her teenage years through her first 3 marriages. The first, to Robert Barlow, which was over all-too-soon. Her second husband, William Cavendish, helped her claim her dower rights from Barlow’s estate and, through Cavendish leaving his estate to her, rather than their children, gave Bess the financial independence that few Tudor women knew and enjoyed. The third husband, Sir William St Loe, was trusted by Queen Elizabeth I herself. Each successive marriage gave Bess greater influence, position and financial independence.
Bess of Hardwick is a woman determined never to be poor again. Clever, beautiful and wise beyond her years, she makes the rules of Tudor society work for her.
But it is not all about money. Gillian Bagwell’s Bess is a fine young woman, learning to find her way in the world, to trust her own instincts to help her children and her wider family. She suffers loss, hardship and uncertainty and is the stronger for it. But this is Tudor England! She also finds herself in the Tower of London, facing questions from the queen’s inquisitors. This is the portrayal of a remarkable young woman who became the matriarch of a powerful family.
On New Years’ Day, as the Zouches and their attendants made their way to the presence chamber of Hampton Court, Bess was very excited. For on this day the king would be presented with his gift – the splendid table and chess pieces, which had been completed in time and had traveled from London swaddled in layers of wool.
The mood at court was lighter and happier than at any time Bess could recall. Anne of Cleves was present, companionably chatting with King Henry, and the shadow of Catherine Howard was almost dispelled by the warmth and light from the hundreds of candles, which made the air redolent of honey. A band of musicians played jaunty dance tunes, and the walls were hung with garlands of holly and ivy. Near the king, a table was stacked with gifts of such magnificence that it staggered Bess. Golden goblets, engraved silver coffers, books in richly ornaments bindings, jeweled collars and belts, furs of deep and gleaming pile, which she longed to touch. But nothing like the chess table the Zouches had brought.
Rich pastries and savory morsels were piled on platters, and great bowls of punch perfumed the air with steam. The room rang with laughter and chatter. Bess, Lizzie, and Doll took up a position near the door where they could watch each new arrival while Audrey trailed Lady Zouche as she made her way around the room greeting friends.
“There’s Anne Basset,” Doll said. “I like her. She always makes me laugh.”
“Lady Latimer is looking very pretty, don’t you think?” Bess asked, eyeing the lady’s emerald silk gown with envy. She didn’t recognize the handsome dark-haired man next to her, but knew it was not Lord Latimer. “Her husband must be too ill to be here.”
“Small wonder, as old as he is,” Doll whispered. “That’s Sir Thomas Seymour with her.”
In Venus in Winter, Gillian Bagwell has skillfully recreated the Tudor world, from the wilds of Derbyshire, to the splendour of the Tudor court. From the last, fearful years of the reign of Henry VIII to the glory and pageantry of Elizabeth I. Her attention to detail and considerable research means that, while the story is fiction it is woven around the historical facts. From her descriptions of the Derbyshire countryside and the detail of the Tudor palaces, you know that Gillian took her research seriously and visited everything she could, adding a note of authenticity to the story.
The characters in Bess of Hardwick are deep and diverse. Bess of Hardwick is a complex young woman, spurred on by a childhood threatened by poverty. She is ambitious, not so much for success as for security. Some of the great names of the Tudor world also put in an appearance. From Elizabeth I to Robert Dudley to Katherine Grey, Bess’s world is occupied by the great and the good of the 16th century. Bess once served in the household of Frances Grey, daughter of Henry VIII’s sister and mother of Jane Grey and Gillian Bagwell draws their story into Bess’s, showing how deep Bess’s affection for the family went. And telling the story of the Nine Days’ Queen through her eyes.
Venus in Winter is not only a wonderful retelling of Bess of Hardwick’s story but also a fascinating exercise in observing the goings-on of the Tudor court through Bess’s eyes. The attention to detail is exquisite.
I would love to see Gillian write a sequel to this, tackling Bess’s last marriage to George Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury. It would be great to read her take on Bess and Shrewsbury’s deteriorating relationship as they act as gaolers for Mary Queens of Scots. And to see how Bess became friends with the captive queen, their scheming to marry Bess’s daughter to Mary’s cousin, that could have put Bess’s granddaughter, Arbella, on the throne, had it not all gone so terribly wrong. What a tale that would be! Especially with Gillian’s genius at storytelling.
To Buy the book: Venus in Winter is available from Amazon
About the author:
Gillian Bagwell’s historical novels have been praised for their vivid and lifelike characters and richly textured, compelling evocation of time and place. Her first career was in theatre, as an actress and later as a director and producer, and she founded the Pasadena Shakespeare Company and produced thirty-seven shows over ten years. Gillian has found her acting experience helpful to her writing, and many of the workshops and classes she’s taught at the annual Historical Novel Society Conferences in the US and the UK relate to her life in theatre, including writing effective historical dialogue, using acting tools to bring characters to life on the page, and giving effective public readings. She’s also a professional editor and provides writing coaching and manuscript evaluations. Gillian lives in Berkeley, California in the house where she grew up, her life enlivened by her five rescue cats.
*
My Books
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Elizabeth Chadwick, Helen Castor, Ian Mortimer, Scott Mariani and Bernard Cornwell and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
When writing non-fiction biographies, you can tell the life of a person. You can say what happened to them, how they affected events and how they were perceived by others. But there are gaps. If you do not have the evidence, you cannot just make it up. If you are looking for reasons, you can offer different scenarios. It is hard to get to the heart of a person, though. You cannot put words in their mouths, or attribute feelings and emotions. Fiction can go where non fiction cannot tread. It can give you a vivid retelling of a fabulous story. It is not always historically accurate, there are some things we cannot know, but fiction can fill in the gaps. It can bring the past to life and give you a sense of the era that no other medium can.
And that is what Terri Lewis has achieved with remarkable skill in her novel if Isabelle d’Angoulême, Behold the Bird in Flight. And it is a pleasure to welcome Terri to History…the Interesting Bits to talk a little about her research behind her novel.
Finding Isabelle, a Mother and a Queen
by Terri Lewis
A birthing stool
I was in high school when I first asked my history teacher, “Where are the women?” An unsatisfactory answer gave impetus to what became a need to find forgotten women. Eventually I became obsessed with Isabelle d’Angoulême, King John’s second wife, and decided to resurrect her by writing a novel.
There are a few documented facts about her life: Historians think she was about twelve years old when John abducted her from her French fiancé, took her to England, and crowned her queen. The chronicles, when they bothered to mention her, were not kind; Matthew Paris called her a “Jezebel” and “slut” who kept John in bed until noon, an assessment most likely reflecting John’s reputation, not the reality of his wife. Isabelle apparently didn’t receive the normal queen’s gold—a percentage of John’s income—or the rents from lands given to her at the time of their marriage; John kept the monies for himself. In “history,” I found only men – fighting, amassing money and enemies, riding off to conquer unknown lands, signing writs, allowing fairs, courting and dancing and always fighting. Isabelle’s life, like the lives of most medieval women, was mainly blank.
But. . . she bore John five children.
My research on medieval childbirth uncovered dire statistics: 20% to 33% of medieval women died from childbearing. The mortality rate per single birth was only slightly higher than in modern times, but multiple pregnancies compounded the risk. Birth control was forbidden by the all-powerful Church so basically a fertile woman had children until menopause or until she died. Because kings had to have sons, as did counts and dukes and other lords—a child to inherit land and carry on the family name. Daughters were less important. An only-child daughter could inherit a kingdom , but not for herself, for her husband. Girls who had brothers would serve as bargaining chips in marriages that formed diplomatic alliances or enlarged territory for their fathers.
In another statistic, infants were uncertain to live to inheritance. Nicholas Orme wrote, “It has been suggested that 25% of [medieval children] may have died in their first year, half as many (12.5%) between one and four, and a quarter as many (6%) between five and nine.” Danger was everywhere. A cut could become infected and penicillin was years in the future. Children fell into wells and down stone stairs, or into the fire that burned in the middle of the great hall, the main source of heat. Many died of illnesses for which bleeding or herbal concoctions were the only cure. Multiple pregnancies mitigated this danger. I note that Isabelle, in addition to the five children with John, had nine more children with her second husband. But two of her own daughters died in childbirth.
Isabelle in her innocence
Isabelle wouldn’t have gone to a hospital. She’d have had a lying-in chamber removed from the main keep and furnished with a birthing stool, a midwife with practical experience but not a doctor because childbirth was a woman’s domain and doctors were men, and a room full of ladies-in-waiting who watched and prayed with her. If the birth was difficult, window shutters would be opened to release the new soul into life. If that failed, an arrow could be shot heavenward to waken God to the peril and ask for his help.
Since history decreed that Isabelle would live through childbirth, I decided to have her observe the suffering of her best friend. That scene became an important milestone in Isabelle’s growing up.
What kind of mother would Isabelle have been? I’d never read about a medieval mother. Women in 1200 who appeared in the chronicles were queens, royalty, or religious. Motherhood was important only for the child, preferable a boy, a gift to the father. The woman was just a bearing body.
I decided that Isabelle learned from her own mother, Alice de Courtney, the granddaughter of Louis le Gros of France. Alice would have been familiar with expectations for noble daughters. And she was married three times. I tried to imagine the experience of being handed to various husbands like a package—the decisions being made by fathers and kings. Perhaps she had grounded herself in her new household with a new husband by following the rules. The first “courtesy book” setting forth standards of behavior— Liber Urbani or the book of civilized man— appeared in England late in the 12th century. Written in Latin, the long poem contained general advice such as honor your parents, hold your tongue, don’t mount your horse in the great hall, and such gems as “when you pick up food with a spoon, do not shovel it on board with your thumb.”
Midwife swaddling the child
I needed to imagine a relationship between Isabelle and her mother. When I was twelve, my mother was the center of everything; I’d come home from school and stand in the kitchen to tell stories about my friends or things the teacher said. But Isi’s mother wouldn’t be in the kitchen. She was a countess; she’d have cooks and laundresses and maids. I couldn’t imagine that she was anything to Isabelle but a rule-maker. And Isabelle’s position required rules. When she was of age, she would be married – handed off in essence – to another count. The marriage would presumably involve a castle and her husband would go off to war or crusade or to visit a king, and Isabelle would be required to manage the vast operation of the castle while he was gone. Even when he was home, she would oversee household tasks, her belt laden with keys to various chests of fabric or spices, to rooms holding barrels of wine and other supplies. So I made her mother strict, set Isabelle chafing against her, then allowed her to escape, grow up a bit, marry John, and have her children.
Two boys first. Then three girls. Today one can find numerous mothers writing how overpowering love when their baby was laid on their breast changed their lives. But as queen of an itinerant court, Isabelle lived on the road with John who visited barons, trying to bring them to heel. So breastfeeding was impractical. It also acted as a form of contraception and Isabelle’s job was to conceive as often as possible and give John heirs. This meant that her babies would be handed over at birth to a wet-nurse, a hired woman who’d breast feed them as if her own. So the first attachment of mother to child was cut off and understandably, wet nurses often developed close relationships with their charges, particularly as children were generally breastfed for longer than they are today – boys often up to the age of two.
13th century depiction of John’s children (Isabelle not included)
At age seven, the boys would have sent to other noble castles for education. Perhaps the idea was that those other educators would have less attachment to the children and thus they would supply a strict upbringing without coddling. Isabelle’s girls would have remained with her as the kingdom fell deeper into chaos. The Barons were revolting, the Pope had excommunicated John, the French were threatening to invade and conquer. With a growing sense that the throne would be gone before her ten-year-old son Henry could assume it, Isabelle would have known the French would kill him along with the rest of her children, leaving no pretenders. How best to save them? I’ll leave that inside the novel and just say she managed as best she could. History has condemned her ultimate decision, but I understand how she came to it.
About the book:
Romantic and stubborn, eleven-year-old Isi plans to marry for love and be mistress of her own castle. But life in 1198 is full of threat and a series of tragic events teaches her growing up is hard. When Isi falls for Hugh, a French nobleman, he consents to marry her, but only for her dowry. She longs for more. Hoping a jealous man will fall in love, she flirts with a king. The flirtation backfires: King John abducts and marries her. Now trapped in cold, warring England with a malicious husband, Isi must hide her yearning for Hugh and find her own power. If she fails, she won’t live to return to her beloved. Inspired by real historical figures—Isabelle d’Angoulême, Hugh de Lusignan, and King John of Magna Carta fame—Behold the Bird in Flight is set in a period that valued women only for their dowries and childbearing. Isabelle’s story has been mainly erased by men, but the medieval chronicles suggest a woman who developed her own power and wielded it. And as the woman behind the throne, who’s to say she didn’t influence history?
About the Author:
Terri Lewis fell in love with medieval history in college. Not the dates or wars, but the mysterious daily lives of the people. Finally two sentences in a book bought at Windsor Castle led her to write her debut novel, Behold the Bird in Flight, A Novel of an Abducted Queen.
Published in Denver Quarterly, Blue Mesa Review, and Chicago Quarterly Review among others, and accepted to the Sewanee Writers’ Conference, she has worked with Laura van den Berg, Jill McCorkle, and Rebecca Makkai. Shortlisted for LitMag’s Virginia Woolf Award for Short Fiction, she won the 2025 Miami University Press Novella Prize. She reviews for The Washington Independent Review of Books.
Before she was an author, she had career as a ballet dancer in Denver and Germany, ran a dance company in Arkansas, earned a B.A. in history and education, and an M.A. in theater, not necessarily in that order. She lives with her husband and two lively dogs in Denver, Colorado.
Where to find Terri:
Website: Substack: Instagram: terri.lewis1: Facebook: terri lewis author
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
Time for another edition of Wordly Women! It has been great fun, meeting all these amazing authors. I do hope everyone is enjoying it as much as I am. Today, I want to introduce you to a very dear friend, historical novelist Cathie Dunn. Cathie and I have known each other a good few years on Facebook, so much so that the first time we met in real life, there was no awkwardness. I love that about social media!
So, let me introduce you to Cathie!
Sharon: Hi, Cathie, first things first, what got you into writing?
Cathie: Ooh, that takes me back decades! It was the romantic historical novels by the likes of M.M. Kaye, Victoria Holt / Philippa Carr (Eleanor Burford’s pseudonyms), in my late teens that got me hooked. I loved Ms Holt’s gothic romance novels in particular, at the time. They were so atmospheric, and – growing up in Germany – I loved the vision of historic and haunted English manors. During the late 1990s and 2000s, after my move to the UK, I learnt a lot about how to create a compelling plot, within a realistic historical setting, by devouring novels by Helen Hollick, Elizabeth Chadwick, and Barbara Wood, amongst others. It was enough to make me embark on HE Certificate in Creative Writing (online) at Lancaster University (though at the time, I was the only one on the course who wrote historical fiction). But at least, it provided me with deeper insights into the writing craft.
Sharon: Tell us about your books.
Cathie: I started off with a project which went from romance to murder mystery to spy novel to (supposedly) a series of events set during the Anarchy – one of my favourite eras. To date, Dark Deceit is an undefined mix, which I’ll need to untangle at some point in time.
Sharon: Yes please! I want to read it!
Cathie: In 2009, I took part in NaNoWriMo, working on a Scottish romance set after the 1715 Jacobite rebellion. I used real locations and studied the background history in depth – too much for traditional romance publishers, who duly rejected it. Fortunately, Highland Arms was picked up by a fabulous US indie press, and my path was clear! I later wrote a second Scottish romance, A Highland Captive, set during the Wars of Independence.
After my move from Scotland to France, my focus changed to medieval French history, with a dual-timeline mystery inspired by my surroundings. Love Lost in Time delves into the distant past of the county of Carcassonne. And the novel immortalised a young cat I lost too soon, Shadow.
Next, I wrote a novel set at the court of Louis XIV. The Shadows of Versailles deals with a dark side of the otherwise glittering court: the Affair of the Poisons. It may be too dark for some readers, as it contains disturbing scenes of child abductions and black masses. Tragically, it’s all based on real, credible accounts of the time. Researching history can be revolting, at times.
After that serious topic, I needed a more positive distraction, and I promptly delved into the foundation years of Normandy, a county I love. Ascent tells the forgotten story of Poppa of Bayeux. Everyone with a TV now knows her more danico husband – Rollo – but who was the mother of his children? Sadly, she was overlooked in the recent series, Vikings. Ascent tells her (fictionalised) story.
Sharon: What attracts you to the early medieval period?
Cathie: It was an era of great change, all across the British Isles and the European continent. The old ways and beliefs had been discarded, to make way for a Church growing in political influence, and it all makes for fascinating research. New hierarchies were formed amidst a continuing power struggle between different families. As the appointments of ‘nobility’ grew into fashion, so did the influence of favourites and allies on rulers. It was a fascinating time.
Sharon: Who is your favourite early medieval character and why?
Image of the statue of Poppa of Bayeux, Bayeux – Photochrom Print Collection
Cathie: Ooh, that’s a tricky one. There are so many real people we know little about, especially women.
(So, a big *Thank You* to you for shining a light on them with your brilliant books!)
I do think Poppa of Bayeux deserves a lot more credit. She had to deal with so many challenges – married to a marauding stranger who was likely a decade or two older, and a Pagan; bearing his children; fleeing with him to Anglia; returning to see his power increase, while she is quietly forgotten. I quite like her to be my favourite early medieval character.
Charles Martel is another. He was a fascinating man, paving the way for a greater Frankish kingdom with his conquests across what is now France. Whilst most people know his grandson, Charlemagne, without Charles, Charlemagne’s ascent in the political sphere of central Europe would not have been possible. Was Charles likeable? Hm, I’m not sure. We know he was ruthless, efficient, and a capable leader of men. Did he have time to be nice? Perhaps that’s a question for another writing project…
Sharon: Who is your least favourite early medieval character and why?
Cathie: That would probably be Charles the Fat, Carolingian King of the Franks and Holy Roman Emperor for a few years in the 880s. He was ineffective, and hopeless at controlling different sections of his empire. He was deposed and died in early 888, and the crown went to Odo of Paris. The Carolingian dynasty was restored after Odo’s reign, though the crown of Frankia went back and forth for a while. This is the era Ascent is set in, and it made for intriguing research.
The real Rollo surely had his work cut out, having to deal with all these changing rulers and their agendas.
Sharon: How do you approach researching your topic?
Cathie: I love history books. I think by now I own more history books than novels! Usually, I start with checking online resources. Jstor is a useful site, where you can read a number of articles for free each month; Medievalists.net is another helpful resource.
But most online sites just give you only an overview, so you need to check books that focus on the relevant era. I have an array of history books on early, high & late medieval England, Tudor England, and medieval & Jacobite Scotland on my shelves. For my France-based novels, I consult non-fiction books in French, many of which I find (handily!) in second-hand bookshops. I also use German resources, where needed.
I find that having a range of resources from different countries to consult is the best way to get a fair overview of historic events. We know that original sources were often (though not always) based on what rulers wanted the rest of the world to know – that being not necessarily the full truth. The winner records history in his favour. So, drawing from sources in different languages adds to the experience in discovering the past.
Sharon: That is so true!
Sharon: Tell us your ‘favourite’ medieval story you have come across in your research.
Image of Albrecht Dürer’s painting of Charlemagne
Cathie: Unfortunately, it is difficult to find credible stories about early medieval characters, unless they were major players like Charlemagne, due to the loss (or deliberate omission) of references for lesser-known individuals.
Therefore, I’ve chosen Charlemagne’s wives and concubines as a story I find entertaining, and enlightening! I mean – how on earth did the man have the time to marry four times, have several concubines after the death of his last wife (and possibly before) – and father an estimated twenty (20!) children? His court was always travelling across his ever-expanding realm (and later, his empire), though it is said that his main seat at Aachen (Aix-la-Chapelle) became his favourite.
He insisted his illegitimate children were raised alongside his legitimate offspring, ensuring they all received an education deserving of their Royal bloodline. After his son Pepin’s untimely death, he even took his grandchildren in to be educated with the others.
This is a fact I recently discovered, and now I’m curious to find out more! With daughters, and especially illegitimate ones, usually being swept off into marriage or convents, his insistence that they are all educated is telling. Clearly, here was a man who valued learning – be that in practical skills or reading and writing.
For a man who ruthlessly expanded his territories, responsible for subjugation of peoples and a great number of deaths ranging from Germanic Saxony to the Iberian Peninsula, this shows an entirely different side of the ‘great Charles’.
Sharon: Tell us your least ‘favourite’ medieval story you have come across in your research.
Cathie: That has to be Charlemagne’s darkest episode – the subjugation of Germanic Pagan tribes in Saxony. The wars lasted – on and off – for three decades, and they were brutal. The Saxons did not give in easily, much to Charlemagne’s frustration, and their conversion to Christianity was slow. Their skirmishes into his territory vexed him immensely.
Eventually, according to the Royal Frankish Annals, the infamous ‘Blood Court’ massacre at Verden, in October 882, saw the execution of approx. 4,500 Saxon ‘rebels’ captured after recent battles. Their leader, Widukind, had managed to flee north.
Although later historians disputed the figure quoted in the annals, with several trying to make ridiculous excuses for Charlemagne’s actions, there seems to have been a great slaughter of thousands of prisoners, regardless. Charlemagne wanted to set an example, an effective deterrent.
Warfare continued for three more years, then it was all over for the Saxons, especially after Widukind converted to Christianity. But it was the massacre at Verden that remained like a blood stain on his otherwise pristine reputation.
Sharon: Are there any other eras you would like to write about?
Cathie: I do love different eras, as you know. The Anarchy is definitely high on my list, and I’ll have to revisit Dark Deceit to see where it takes me. (Sharon: Do it! Please!)
But I also love the court of Louis XIV of France, with all its superficial splendour and dark secret plots. The Affair of the Poisons is such an intriguing event, with many prolific nobles implicated in trying to influence the king’s opinion through nefarious deeds. Deeply disturbing, and utterly fascinating.
And then, of course, is the time of the Scottish Wars of Independence. It wasn’t easy to mess with a remarkable, power-hungry king like Edward I! (Sharon: Ooh, yes!)
But, ultimately, it’s the late Dark Ages (do we still call it that, as they weren’t really that dark?) and early Middle Ages that keep me hooked. Oh, to travel to Frankia for one day only…
Sharon: What are you working on now?
Cathie: My current WIP is called Treachery, and it’s the story of Sprota the Breton, handfasted wife of William Longsword – Poppa’s and Rollo’s son. Like his father and his two wives, William married Sprota in more danico (in the Danish custom), and Luitgarde of Vermandois in a proper Church blessing, for political reasons.
Even less is known of Sprota than of Poppa; mainly that she was mother to William’s only son, Richard, likely the first Duke of Normandy. (Rollo and William never were dukes.) I introduced her towards the end of Ascent, when she had to flee to Bayeux as William’s enemies closed in on him at his fortress in Fécamp. Following William’s assassination by Count Arnulf of Flanders in 842, Sprota had to remarry to keep her young son’s inheritance secure. And to ensure his safety!
Her responsibility as the mother of William’s heir, and her struggles for them to survive, make for an intriguing story. So many powerful men had set their sights on Normandy, wanting Richard out of the way. I hope to do Sprota justice, as, again, she has been forgotten in time.
The third and final instalment of my House of Normandy trilogy about the early ladies of Normandy will conclude in Reign, about Richard’s second wife (and previous lover), Gunnora.
Then there’s Poppa’s daughter Adela, married to the Count of Poitou. Perhaps a companion novel? 😉 Sigh…
Sharon: And finally, what is the best thing about being a writer?
Cathie: Exploring past histories is utterly fascinating, and I can only recommend it. That goes for the good and the bad we discover in our research.
Reliving the distant past is fun, but also a great responsibility, as we should stay as close to the few known facts as possible. An ogre can’t just turn into a Prince Charming, although looking at Charlemagne, he definitely had two sides to his character – the caring father interested in learning and culture, and ruthless ruler chopping off heads of his prisoners. A man of his times. But what about his women? (Cathie, behave! One novel at a time…)
And though my earlier works focused more on events and fictional characters, I now find it far more rewarding to bring forgotten women from the distant past back to life, even ‘just’ in fictionalised format. Their stories must be told.
Thank you again for letting me ramble on about my research and writing. It’s been fabulous revisiting my stories, and the real characters involved in them, and I hope your readers enjoy my interview.
Sharon: Cathie, thank you so much! It has been a pleasure! No wonder you and I get on so well!
About the Author:
Cathie Dunn is an Amazon-bestselling author of historical fiction, dual-timeline, mystery, and romance. She loves to infuse her stories with a strong sense of place and time, combined with a dark secret or mystery – and a touch of romance. Often, you can find her deep down the rabbit hole of historical research…
In addition, she is also a historical fiction book promoter with The Coffee Pot Book Club, a novel-writing tutor, and a keen book reviewer on her blog, Ruins & Reading.
After having lived in Scotland for almost two decades, Cathie is now enjoying the sunshine in the south of France with her husband, and her rescued pets, Ellie Dog & Charlie Cat.
She is a member of the Historical Novel Society, the Richard III Society, the Alliance of Independent Authors, and the Romantic Novelists’ Association.
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
Unusually for a king in medieval times, by 1185 William the Lion, King of Scots had been on the throne for 20 years, was past 40 and was still unmarried, despite having several illegitimate children. Until he married, William’s heir was his younger brother, David. Ironically, William’s mother, Ada de Warenne, who had been so keen to find a bride for her oldest son Malcolm IV that she was not above putting suitable girls in his bed, does not seem to have had the same sense of urgency with William. There’s no evidence that she pressured him to marry as she had his older brother. Though, I suppose, at least William had shown an interest in women and had the bastards to prove it.
And William was looking for a bride. Henry II, always happy to remind William that he was the Scots king’s overlord, exercised his right to choose William’s wife.
In May 1186, during a council at Woodstock, King Henry suggested Ermengarde de Beaumont as a bride for William. Ermengarde was the daughter of Richard, Vicomte de Beaumont-sur- Sarthe, who was himself the son of Constance, one of the many illegitimate daughters of King Henry I of England. With such diluted royal blood, she was hardly a prestigious match for the king of Scots. William felt slighted but he reluctantly accepted the marriage after consulting his advisers, the offer sweetened by a generous payment for the wedding celebrations and the return of two forfeited Scottish castles, as a wedding present.
Henry II, King of England, Lincoln Cathedral
We have, of course, no record of Ermengarde’s thoughts on the marriage, nor of whether she was aware of the fact it was seen as an insult to the Scots king. The wedding was celebrated at Woodstock, conducted by the Archbishop of Canterbury, on 5 September 1186,
‘with great magnificence, on the nones of September [5th Sept.] (being the sixth day of the week [Friday], the moon being in her eighteenth day), in the royal chapel in the park at Woodstock, in the presence of the king himself.’1
Following the ceremony, King Henry hosted 4 days of festivities. Although we do not know Ermengarde’s birth date, at the time of the marriage, she was described as ‘a girl’, suggesting that she may have only just reached the age of 12, the minimum legal age girls could marry. It has been suggested that Ermengarde’s tender age may also have been the reason for William’s reluctance to marry her.
We do not know the year of birth of Ermengarde’s first child, a daughter named Margaret, but it was sometime between 1187 and 1195. Another daughter, Isabella, was born a year or two later. If Ermengarde gave birth to Margaret the year after her marriage, it seems highly likely that she was at least fourteen or fifteen years old at the time of her wedding. However, a later birthdate, in the 1190s would suggest that Ermengarde was younger at the time of her marriage and was given time to mature before bearing children. The king’s growing need for an heir would, perhaps, indicate that Ermengarde was old enough to bear children at the time of their marriage, and that describing the bride as ‘a girl’ was alluding to her youth, but not her actual age. Unfortunately, the vagaries of chroniclers means that we cannot say for certain
In the spring of 1195 King William fell gravely ill at Clackmannan, causing a succession crisis, the sum of his legitimate children being one, possibly two, daughters at this time – and no son. The Scottish barons deliberated a number of options, such as recognising William’s oldest legitimate daughter, Margaret, as his heir. They also considered marrying Margaret to Otto, Duke of Saxony, grandson of Henry II, and allowing Otto to succeed to the throne. The earl of Dunbar led a faction who claimed that both solutions were contrary to the custom of the land, so long as the king had a brother who could succeed him. Traditionally, the Scots throne had passed to the oldest, legitimate, male member of the royal family, rather than by primogeniture.
This must have been a worrying time for Ermengarde, not only for the health of her husband, but for her own status in Scotland, should her daughter be disinherited. Not to mention the concern that Margaret, then aged only 8 at the most, might be married at such a young age to secure the succession. In the event, the discussion was moot as the king recovered from his illness and three years later the queen gave birth to Alexander, the much-desired son and heir.
Alexander II, King of Scots
Chronicler John of Fordun described the relief and celebration felt throughout the country at the birth of the heir to the Scots throne:
‘Now this most fortunate king of Scotland, William, had, nearly twelve years ago, with great splendour and rejoicings, taken to wife Ermyngarde, daughter of the Viscount of Beaumont… By her he had a son, named Alexander, — to the great gladness of his people, and the refreshment of the whole kingdom of the Scots, as the after course of these annals will show forth. He was born at Haddington, on Saint Bartholomew’s Day, in the year 1198. In every place in the whole country, the common folk used to forsake their menial work on this day, wherein they first heard tidings of his birth, and spend it in joy; while priests and churchmen donned the alb, and walked in procession, with loud voice glorifying God in hymns and canticles, and humbly praising Him.’
Although she does not act as a witness on any of King William’s extant charters, Queen Ermengarde appears to have played an active role in Scotland, with William allowing her an increasingly influential part in public affairs. One disgruntled canon, in 1207, complained that Walter, a royal chaplain, had obtained the bishopric of Glasgow by not only bribing the king’s chamberlain, but also Queen Ermengarde. The queen may also have offered patronage to relatives, including one Richard de Beaumont, perhaps a brother or cousin, who received substantial lands in Crail. As the king’s health declined in old age – he was already 46 when he married Ermengarde – the queen took on more responsibilities, especially where her children were concerned.
Relations with England had changed in 1199, with the accession of King John, the youngest son of Henry II. During the reign of King Richard, William had agreed with the justiciar, William Longchamp, and supported Arthur of Brittany as the king’s heir. However, it was John who succeeded Richard and he may well have remembered William’s stance. Soon after John’s accession, King William asked for the return of Northumberland. The two kings met at Lincoln in 1200, with William doing homage for his English lands but getting no satisfaction in his claim to Northumberland. In subsequent meetings, John continued to prevaricate, leaving the dispute unresolved.
In the meantime, the death of the bishop of Durham meant John took over the vacant see and set about building a castle at Tweedmouth. The Scots, saw this as a direct threat to Berwick and destroyed the building works. Matters reached a crisis point in 1209.
King John of England
After many threats, and with both sides building up their armies, the two kings met at Norham, Northumberland, in the last week of July and first week of August 1209. The Scots were in a desperate position, with an ailing and ageing king, and a 10-year-old boy as heir, whilst the English, with their Welsh allies and foreign mercenaries, had an army big enough to force a Scottish submission. Queen Ermengarde appears to have acted as a mediator between the two kings, although the subsequent treaty, agreed at Norham on 7 August, was humiliating for the Scots it did, at least, prevent a war. The Scots agreed to pay 15,000 marks for peace and to surrender hostages, including the king’s two oldest legitimate daughters, Margaret and Isabella. As a sweetener, John promised to marry the Margaret to one of his sons; although Henry was only 2 years old at the time and Richard was just 8 months, whilst the girls were already in their mid teens, at least. It was agreed that Isabella would be married to an English noble of suitable rank, an earl at least.
The king’s daughters and the other Scottish hostages were handed into the custody of England’s justiciar, at Carlisle on 16 August.
How the girls, or their parents, thought about this turn of events, we know not. Given John’s proven record of prevarication and perfidy, King William may have hoped that the promised marriages would occur in good time but may also have expected that John would find a way out of the pledges he had made. William and John met again at Durham in February 1212, a meeting in which ‘The queen of Scotland was present and acted as mediator, an extraordinary woman, gifted with a charming and witty eloquence.’3 The queen’s efforts bore fruit and peace between the two countries was renewed, as ‘There in the presence of the nobles of both kingdoms and the revered lady the queen of the Scots a formula for achieving peace and love, to be observed between the kingdoms and their kings for ever, was worked out anew and confirmed by charters given by both parties.’4
It was also agreed that the Scottish prince, Alexander, should be given an English wife. With at least one of the prince’s older sisters already intended for a son of King John, marrying Alexander to one of John’s daughters would further bind the Scots to the Plantagenet cause. Prince Alexander, now aged 14, would be knighted by King John, the ceremony taking place at Clerkenwell on 4 March 1212.
Ermengarde may have taken a more prominent role in the negotiations of 1212 as King William’s health began to fail. Their son, Alexander, was still only a teenager and so it would have fallen to the queen to take the lead in the talks. William was a physically active king almost to the very last moment. In January and February 1213, when both the Scots and English kings were close to the border, a meeting was proposed, but William resisted and could not be persuaded to meet with John. In his 70th year, he was probably already very ill.
18th century image of William I the Lion
As William’s health failed, Queen Ermengarde appears to have taken on more responsibilities and exerted her influence on the court. The king rallied in 1214, so that he was well enough to travel to Elgin in the summer, where he came to an accord with John, the new earl of Caithness, and received the earl’s unnamed daughter as a hostage. The journey took its toll on the king, and he suffered some sort of collapse. He was taken, in easy stages, to the royal castle at Stirling, where he saw his lords for the last time. With the queen in attendance, William urged his barons and bishops to accept Alexander, now 16 years old, as king. King William I, later known as William the Lion, died on 4 December 1214, aged about seventy-one, having reigned for a total of forty-nine years, almost to the day.
On the morning after her husband’s death, Queen Ermengarde was ‘in a state of extreme mourning and worn out with grief.’5 The prelates and nobles attempted to rouse the queen from her melancholy by asking that she arrange the late king’s funeral, but the queen would not be moved. They left Ermengarde with her grief and took the young king to Scone, where he was crowned as King Alexander II on 6 December. King William was then buried at Arbroath on 10 December. The new king and his mother then presided over the royal Christmas feast at Forfar but returned to Stirling in January 1215, before visiting Arbroath, to see the tomb of King William.
Queen Ermengarde had been much younger than her husband, possibly by as much as thirty years. She would, therefore, continue to live for many years into her son’s reign.
Magna Carta
King Alexander II sided with the English barons in their struggle against the tyranny of King John, making an alliance with the northern barons, who agreed to press for a decision on the future of Alexander’s sisters, and a resolution of the lordship of the northern counties. He raided the northern English earldoms, exploiting the unrest in England to renew Scottish claims to these counties, besieging Norham in October 1215 and receiving the homage of the leading men of Northumberland. And when a French force joined the fight on the side of the rebels, the papal legate pronounced a sentence of excommunication on the rebels and their French and Scottish allies; it even extended to Queen Ermengarde. Scotland put under interdict. Following John’s death in October 1216 and the defeat of the French rebel army at Lincoln in May 1217, Alexander’s position in England became precarious.
The Scots king surrendered Carlisle Castle at Berwick on 1 December 1217 and submitted to England’s boy-king Henry III at Northampton later in the same month. Alexander’s sentence of excommunication was lifted by the archbishop of York, while the bishop of Durham absolved his mother, Queen Ermengarde.
With King Alexander’s submission, there followed an unprecedented almost 80 years of unbroken peace between England and Scotland, sealed by his marriage – in York – with Joan, Henry III’s sister in June 1221. Another marriage soon followed, when, in London on 30 October, Alexander’s oldest sister, Margaret, was married to Hubert de Burgh.
Joan of England, Queen of Scots
Queen Ermengarde must have felt relief that her son had found a bride, and hoped that an heir would soon follow. She may also have been satisfied that her eldest daughter, Margaret, once thought of as the heir to the Scots throne, was also finally settled in matrimony. Though there was complaint from some sides that Margaret had been pressed into a disparaging marriage when she had been promised a prince as a bridegroom. Hubert de Burgh was King Henry III’s justiciar, but was of minor nobility. He only receive his earldom of Kent after his marriage to Margaret. As for Margaret’s sister Isabella, she returned to Scotland, still unmarried. She eventually married Roger Bigod, the young Earl of Norfolk, in 1225. The wedding took place at Alnwick, in Northumberland, which may mean that Queen Ermengarde was able to attend.
Queen Ermengarde devoted her later years to founding an abbey at Balmerino, with the help of Alexander. A parish in the district of Cupar in county of Fife, it was an area she regularly visited for the benefit of her health. The dowager queen raised the money to found the Cistercian abbey, paying 1,000 merks to purchase the land and acting as overseer to the building project. The abbey was built in red stone, quarried locally. Dedicated to Saint Edward the Confessor, Balmerino was populated by monks from Melrose Abbey. Queen Ermengarde appears to have had a particular veneration for the sainted English king as the only other religious gift we can attribute to her was to the hospital of St Edward at Berwick.
The queen had lived long enough to see three of her four children settled in marriage, and may have met her first grandchild, a daughter born to Princess Margaret in 1227, also named Margaret. In the same year, Henry III’s brother Richard, Earl of Cornwall, arrived in Scotland to speak with Queen Ermengarde. The object of the discussions was his possible marriage to the queen’s youngest daughter, Marjory. The earl’s proposals were attractive to neither the Scots nor his brother and negotiations came to naught, but the fact that it was Ermengarde that Richard approached, rather than the king, clearly demonstrates the queen’s continuing influence on her family. Her youngest daughter was not married until August 1235, when she married Gilbert Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, at Berwick.
Balmerino Abbey with Queen Ermengarde’s Cross in the foreground
The queen did not live to see the wedding as in February 1233 Ermengarde de Beaumont died. She was buried before the high altar of the abbey to which she had dedicated her years of widowhood, Balmerino. Although the surviving records hint at the queen enjoying substantial authority in Scotland, especially where her family were concerned, we have few specifics. That she was entrusted with negotiating with the English emissaries, in 1209 and again in 1212, suggests that she possessed impressive diplomatic skills, and that King William had considerable confidence in his wife’s abilities. Furthermore, the queen’s evident grief at her husband’s death attests to a deep affection within the union, an affection that not only defined the marriage, but also the whole family, with the queen continuing to exert her influence on the relationships of her children in the years after her husband’s death.
Having served Scotland as queen for 28 years and as its dowager queen for a further 19 years, Ermengarde de Beaumont defined the role of Queen of Scots for subsequent royal consorts. Her memory cast a long shadow.
1. Mediaeval chronicles of Scotland, translated by Joseph Stephenson; 2. John of Fordun’s Chronicle of the Scottish Nation; 3. Walter Bower, Scotichronicon, V 4; 4. ibid; 5. Rosalind K. Marshall, Scottish Queens 1034–1714
Bibliography:
Walter Bower, Scotichronicon, V 4; Chronicles of the Picts, chronicles of the Scots, and other early memorials of Scottish history, edited by W. F. Skene; fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SCOTLAND; John of Fordun’s Chronicle of the Scottish Nation, edited by W. F. Skene, Edinburgh, Edmonston and Douglas; Rosalind K. Marshall, Scottish Queens 1034–1714; Mediaeval chronicles of Scotland: the chronicles of Melrose and Holyrood, translated by Joseph Stephenson; Richard Oram, editor, The Kings and Queens of Scotland; The annals of Roger de Hoveden. Comprising the history of England and of other countries of Europe from A.D. 732 to A.D. 1201, edited by Henry T. Riley; David Ross, Scotland, History of a Nation; W.W. Scott, Ermengarde [Ermengarde de Beaumont], oxforddnb.com; W.W. Scott, William I [known as William the Lion] (c. 1142–1214), oxforddnb.com
*
My Books:
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
When I started writing my blog way back in 2015, Susan Abernethy already had a successful website telling the stories from History. Despite that, she never saw me as competition. Susan offered me advice and encouragement. And I will never forget that. So, today, it is so nice to be able to pay a little of that back by welcoming Susan to my author spotlight series, Wordly Women, to tell us a little of her writing journey – and about her two books, the second of which, The Formidable Women who Shaped Medieval Europe: Power and Patronage at the Burgundian Court, hits the shops at the end of October.
Welcome Susan!
Sharon: So, What got you into writing?
Susan: A friend of mine from high school started a women’s history blog in 2012 and put out a call for someone to join her in writing articles. I didn’t even know if I could write but I answered and wrote an article on Queen Emma of Normandy. It got a really good reception, and the writing took off from there. Later, I decided it would be good to write not only about women, but other topics in history and so The Freelance History Writerblog began.
Sharon: Tell us about your books.
Susan: Many years ago, I found the books of Jean Plaidy in the library and read every one I could get my hands on. This included The Merry Monarch’s Wife, about Catherine of Braganza, wife of King Charles II. When I started the blog in 2012, one of my plans was to write an article about every Queen of England. While doing some research on Catherine of Braganza, it seemed like there wasn’t a great deal of information about her available, especially in English. It turned out most of the biographies were old, published in 1915 and in the 1930’s and 40’s.
Also, people, including myself, believed Catherine was miserable and nearly forgotten because of her unfaithful husband and his glamourous mistresses. I wondered if this was true. Having very little knowledge of Portuguese history, I ended up reading dozens of history books about the country and their seaborne empire, which is pretty fascinating stuff. This research was necessary to put Catherine in historical context and to explain why the ports of Tangier and Bombay were included in her dowry.
Isabel, at the age of thirty, married Philip the Good, the third Valois Duke of Burgundy and was the mother of the fourth duke, Charles the Bold. After reading biographies of Isabel and Charles, they seemed to me to be captivating characters, both strong and powerful. Charles also appeared to be a real character and possibly suffering from some kind of mental illness. After writing articles about both of them, I decided to delve further into Burgundian history, which covers the Low Countries, northern France and part of the Holy Roman Empire. Richard Vaughan wrote excellent biographies of all four of the Valois Dukes so that is where the research started.
Philip the Bold, one of the greatest diplomats in his era, began a program of amassing an empire which included the marriages of his daughters, granddaughters, nieces and many others into various houses of Europe. This book is a collection of 31 women related to the Valois dukes by blood and marriage. It includes the wives of kings, dauphins, dukes, counts, and others along with a few queens and a queen regnant, even a saint. In telling their stories, you discover a great variety of history of many principalities of western Europe.
Sharon: Is there a book you’ve read recently that influenced your research?
Susan: A year or so ago, I read Sharon L Jansen’s book The Monstrous Regiment of Women: Female Rulers in Early Modern Europe. Her main point is that historical family trees basically only show the descendants of men. If the women are mentioned at all, it is as the wife or maybe the daughter if she married an important man. She says we need to look at the women and their connections, not just their husbands and children. How did they interact with other women? A total eye-opener for me, now I cannot look at history in any other way. It really guided me in the research and writing of my second book on the Valois royal and aristocratic women. Some of these women lived in luxurious comfort while others had to scrape and fight to keep their patrimonies from being wrested from them by powerful men.
Sharon: This is soooooo true!
Sharon: Who is your favorite historical person and why?
Susan: I have many favorites so it’s hard to choose one. Margaret of Austria, Regent of the Netherlands and Anne de Beaujeu, Duchess of Bourbon and Regent of France, come to mind, both of whom are in the second book. But while I was researching the formidable women, I came across Catherine of Burgundy, Duchess of Austria and Countess of Ferrette, the daughter of Philp the Bold. Her life really captivated me for several reasons. When her father didn’t pay the balance of her dowry, she convinced her husband to give her the county of Ferrette, not just for the income but to rule on her own.
Catherine took full advantage of this opportunity. She acted as diplomat for her brother, John the Fearless and her nephew Philip the Good. She engaged in feuds and even started a small conflict with the city of Basel. She must have had remarkable charisma and a forceful personality. But the best part is she made a marriage without the permission of her brother. I haven’t come across many women who did such a thing. She may have done it to have an ally for her feuds and to maintain her position as countess. But she also may have been in love with the man. When her nephew Philip forced her to back out of the marriage, she seems to have lost her will to live which is pretty sad. But she’s my current favorite medieval historical person.
Sharon: Who is your least favorite historical person and why?
Susan: At the moment, I’m going to say Ferdinand of Aragon for several reasons. One the one hand, I have to admire his political acumen and diplomatic panache. In the era of Isabella of Castile, King Henry VIII, King Francis I and Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, he held his own. But his treatment of women is abominable.
He appears to have navigated his relationship with Isabella really well. They were on equal footing and managed to share their responsibilities. But once Isabella was gone, he engaged in antics like marrying again to try to have another child to displace his daughter Juana as queen of Aragon, as well as not supporting his younger daughter Katherine of Aragon once her husband Arthur Tudor died. He also is responsible, along with her husband Philip as well as her son HRE Charles V, for spreading terrible rumors about Juana of Castile’s mental health and for her eventual captivity which lasted for 45 years. It’s not a pretty story.
Sharon: How do you approach researching your topic?
Susan: The process of research starts with reading. Lots of reading. After finding as many books as I can on my topic, I start reading and find more resources. This process also involves searches on the internet for sources. Then, I make notes from my reading. I treat each chapter of the book as if it were an extended post for my blog. The notes are combined into a narrative which then becomes a chapter, and the chapters are assimilated into the book.
Sharon: Tell us your ‘favourite’ story you have come across in your research.
Susan: This is a good one! Many years ago, I read a turn of the century biography of Philippa of Hainault, queen of King Edward III of England. The king and queen arranged a marriage for their eldest daughter Isabella to Louis II, Count of Flanders, also known as Louis of Male. The author relates the story of how Louis jilted Isabella at the altar, fleeing to France to avoid the wedding ceremony. Louis had promised his ally, King Philip VI of France that he would marry Margaret, the middle daughter of the Duke of Brabant and he eventually did.
Now Louis was not a faithful husband to Margaret and had something along the lines of 18 illegitimate children. Margaret was 7 years older than Louis. She gave birth to her daughter Margaret of Male in 1350 who eventually married the first Duke of Burgundy, Philip the Bold in 1369. Two years later, Countess Margaret deserted the court of Flanders to live in the country.
The author of the biography of Philippa of Hainault casually mentions that Margaret, Countess of Flanders, ordered the nose of Louis’ mistress cut off after the mistress gave birth to twins. As a result of her injuries, the mistress died. She insinuates this was the reason for Margaret abandoning the court. This sensational story really piqued my curiosity, and I searched for the truth for a long time.
Why did Margaret desert the Flemish court, something Belgian historians have debated for years? Did Louis abandon her? Did she abandon him? Was she mentally ill? Is there a history of mental illness in the House of Reginar of Brabant?
It seems an unknown chronicler from Bruges, in 1430, is the instigator of the report of Margaret cutting off the nose of Louis’ lover. He wrote this sixty years after the alleged event. It is entirely possible he spoke with someone who knew the truth of the matter from oral tradition. It is also possible he made up the entire scenario. Since then, a chronicler restated the story in 1531, and popular historians have repeated it down through the ages. While there is still the possibility the story is true, it is highly unlikely, and these chroniclers may have had their own agenda in spreading the rumors.
The stories of the jilting of Isabella, the marriage of Margaret of Brabant to Louis, Count of Flanders and her daughter Margaret of Male, wife of Philip the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, are all in the Formidable Women book.
Sharon: Tell us your least ‘favourite’ story you have come across in your research.
Susan: That has to be the story of Blanche II, Titular Queen of Navarre. Her father was King Juan II of Aragon, and her mother was Blanche I, Queen of Navarre. King Juan was crafty and sly and ruled Navarre by right of his wife. But once Blanche I died, a family feud ensued and King Juan did everything in his power to retain the governance of Navarre, even going so far as to ignore the rights of Blanche II and her brother Charles who had both gained the approval of the Cortes of Navarre as the legal heirs of Blanche I.
This state of affairs lasted for years. Blanche II had been married to Enrique IV of Castile, but the marriage was not a happy one and eventually, the union was annulled and Blanche II returned to Aragon. Her father locked her up in prison to prevent her from gaining the throne of Navarre to which she was legally entitled. Blanche remained in prison from 1453 until her death under suspicious circumstances in December 1464.
What makes this story even sadder is the fact that King Juan II of Aragon married again and had a son, Ferdinand of Aragon, who married Isabella of Castile and was the father of Queen Juana of Castile. In an eerie twist of fate, similar to Blanche II of Navarre, Ferdinand managed to declare his daughter Juana mentally unstable and locked her up for 45 years in Tordesillas. History repeats itself.
Sharon: Are there any other eras you would like to write about?
Susan: My interest in the medieval, early modern and Renaissance eras is pretty passionate and I’ve been out of my element by writing about the Stuart era. But the Stuart’s need an update and more scrutiny. If I did look at a different era, it might be Italian medieval and Renaissance history, a subject I’ve tried to avoid for many years because I found it to be meandering and complicated. But recently, I’ve delved into the stories of women such as Bona of Savoy, who features in my second book, as well as Bianca Maria Visconti, mother of Bona’s husband, Galeazzo Maria Sforza, Duke of Milan, and Valentina Visconti, wife of Louis I, Duke of Orleans who was assassinated by John the Fearless, Duke of Burgundy. These are tremendous women’s stories and pique my interest for more.
Sharon: What are you working on now?
Susan: I’m currently in the research stage of writing a biography of Mary Beatrice d’Este, second wife of King James II of England. She was the sister-in-law of Catherine of Braganza and the only Italian Queen of England. This book will be along the same lines as the biography of Catherine.
The research into Mary Beatrice brought up another intriguing subject. Her mother was Laura Martinozzi, Duchess of Modena, one of the many nieces of Cardinal Mazarin, the prime minister of Kings Louis XIII and XIV of France. Seems like another intriguing topic to look into.
Sharon: What is the best thing about being writer?
Susan: Having been an avid reader all my life, being a writer allows me to keep reading and to read about any topic that interests me. I love learning! I probably should have been a history teacher but never pursued it. By writing books and for the blog it allows me to educate people who are interested in the fascinating stories of history. My main goal is to get someone to read a book and hopefully enjoy the history as much as I do.
About the Author:
Susan Abernethy’s passion for history dates back fifty years and led her to study for a Bachelor of Arts degree in history at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She is currently a member of the Rocky Mountain Medieval and Renaissance Association, the Society for Renaissance Studies and the Historical Association. Her work has appeared on several historical websites and in magazines and includes guest appearances on historical podcasts. Her blog, The Freelance History Writer, has continuously published over five hundred historical articles since 2012, with an emphasis on European, Tudor, Medieval, Renaissance, Early Modern and women’s history. She is currently working on her third non-fiction book.
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
Helena Snakenborg, Marchioness of Northampton, in coronation robes, 1603
An Elizabethan whose story I became aware of through a novel is Helena Snakenborg, who features in Tracy Borman’s novel, The King’s Witch. I had to know more about this Swedish lady living in Tudor England, and include her in my own Heroines of the Tudor World. Even more so after I learned that Helena was the only foreigner amongst Queen Elizabeth’s ladies. Helena was born in 1548, into an ancient Swedish baronial family. Her father, Ulf Henriksson, had been a trusted supporter of King Gustav I Vasa of Sweden. Her mother, Agneta Knuttson, was a descendant of the earls of Orkney and it is from her mother’s family that Helena took her name, Snakenborg.
In 1564, at the age of fifteen, Helena was appointed a maid of honour to Gustav Vasa’s daughter, and the sister of the new King Eric XIV, Princess Cecilia. Later that same year, Princess Cecilia embarked on a voyage to England, taking Helena with her. Cecilia claimed that as a committed Anglophile, she wanted to meet the queen of England. She may also have been hoping to revive her brother’s suit for Queen Elizabeth’s hand in marriage. Their overland journey to England was long and arduous.
They travelled through Poland and Germany in order to avoid hostile countries and were hampered by bad weather. The princess was accompanied by her husband and fell pregnant during the journey, necessitating further delays. Almost a year had passed by the time they arrived in London in September 1565, with the Spanish ambassador reporting to Philip II,
‘On the 11th instant [of September] the king of Sweden’s sister entered London at 2 o’clock in the afternoon. She is very far advanced in pregnancy, and was dressed in a black velvet robe with a mantle of black cloth of silver, and wore on her head a golden crown… She had with her six Ladies dressed in crimson taffety with mantles of the same.’1
The arrival of the Swedish princess caused a great deal of excitement at court and the queen gave them a lavish reception. Among Cecilia’s six ladies was Helena Snakenborg and in a letter to her mother, Helena wrote of their reception in England: ‘There came so many to visit us that there was no end to it. All wished us a hearty welcome to England.’2 After the official ceremonies were completed, Princess Cecilia was taken at once to the place designated for her confinement, where she gave birth to a son on 14 September. The princess was given the use of Bedford House as her London residence. She did not remain long in seclusion after the birth and she and her entourage soon became regular visitors at court, treated to receptions and entertainments.
William Parr, Marquess of Northampton
Helena was by all accounts a beautiful young woman, with large brown eyes, red hair and a pink and white complexion. She attracted the attention of William Parr, Marquess of Northampton, a man thirty-five years her senior whose sister, Kateryn Parr, had been Henry VIII’s sixth and final wife. In a letter to her mother, Helena told her about the marquess’s attention:
‘Amongst the gentlemen was a courtier who always came with the earliest arrivals and left amongst the last. When my gracious Lady had been “churched” after the baby was born, the Marquess of Northampton (for that was the courtier’s name) talked to my gracious lady about me.’3
The marquess of Northampton wasted no time in pressing his suit with Helena, sending her lavish gifts of clothes and jewels, and ‘being an impressionable and romantic young girl, Helena was swept off her feet by the experienced older man.’4 Helena was beguiled by Northampton, who wanted to marry her but felt prevented from doing so because, although divorced in 1551, his first wife Lady Anne Bourchier was still alive and there were some doubts as to the validity of the divorce.
In the meantime, Princess Cecilia had run up some rather large debts due to her lavish lifestyle in England. Her debts, in excess of £3,000, had been amassed as a result of the purchase of poultry, articles of plate and jewellery, a kirtle wrought with gold, a Venice lute – the list goes on. The princess left England in order to escape her creditors, though she had been obliged by the queen to sell whatever she could in order to raise as much money as she could to pay off at least some of the debt, leaving England in April 1566. The princess had wanted to take Helena with her, but the young woman was enjoying life in England, and the attentions of the marquess of Northampton, and wanted to stay.
Queen Elizabeth I
Queen Elizabeth came to Helena’s rescue by offering her a place in her household, appointing her a maid of honour in 1567 and later promoting her to Gentlewoman of the Privy Chamber. Although unpaid, the queen awarded her new maid of honour additional privileges, including lodgings at court, servants and a horse. It seems Queen Elizabeth had grown fond of Helena and was keen to help the budding romance of Helena and Northampton. Helena, in her turn, was in the queen’s thrall, emulating her dress and manners and even her signature, underlining the ‘H’ with the same flourish Elizabeth did with her ‘E’. Helena was diligent and conscientious in her duties and became an indispensable member of the queen’s household.
Helena’s relationship with Northampton was still hindered by Northampton’s ambiguous marital status, but the marquess was still generous with Helena, assigning ten of his own servants to care for her and giving her everything she needed or wanted. Helena told her mother: ‘I cannot imagine I shall ever want for anything however beautiful or expensive that his Lordship can buy without his getting it at once for his Elin.’5 The couple’s patience was eventually rewarded, so to speak, with the death of Anne Bourchier in January 1571. William Parr was finally free to marry.
A Young Lady Aged 21 in 1569, tentatively identified as a portrait of Helena Snakenborg
The wedding took place in May in the presence of Queen Elizabeth, who had offered her own closet in Whitehall Palace for the ceremony. The bride was twenty-two and the groom fifty-seven. The newlyweds divided their time between their houses in Guildford, Surrey, and Stanstead Hall, Essex, close enough to London that Helena could attend court regularly. The happy marriage came to a sudden end within just a few months, when the marquess fell ill at Warwick in September 1571. He had been suffering from gout for some time and it now took a turn for the worse. Helena nursed her ailing husband through the ensuing weeks, but the earl succumbed to his illness on 28 October. They had been married just five months. The queen bore the costs of the funeral and even provided material from her own wardrobe for the mourning outfits.
Helena was left a young widow with a substantial dower of £368 per annum from her husband’s estates in Cumberland. She could have retired from court and lived in comfort for the rest of her life, but Helena chose to return to the queen’s service just as soon as her husband’s affairs were settled. It was not long, however, before she attracted a new admirer in Thomas Gorges. Although the queen was initially in favour of the match, she refused to consent to a marriage, either out of jealousy or concern for the disparity in their statuses. Helena was a marchioness, whereas Thomas was merely a gentleman, serving as a Groom of the Privy Chamber. In spite of the queen’s objections, the couple married in secret in 1576, earning themselves Elizabeth’s wrath.
Dismissed from court, Helena wrote to the queen to beg forgiveness, describing herself as ‘a poure, desolate, and banished creature’.6
Thomas Gorges
Helena was soon forgiven and welcomed back to court, with the queen granting Helena manors in Huntingdonshire and Wiltshire. Her second marriage appears to have been as happy as the first, if not happier. Two years later, Helena left court to give birth to her first child, a daughter named after Elizabeth for whom the queen acted as godmother, presenting Helena with a silver-gilt bowl at the christening. A son, Francis, was probably born the following year, with at least six more children after that, two more daughters and four more sons, the last being born in 1589.
Despite her growing brood Helena still served the queen, acting as her deputy at the baptisms of children of distinguished noblemen, especially towards the end of the reign as the queen’s health was deteriorating. Helena was with Elizabeth during her final illness at Richmond and remained with the queen’s body after her death on 24 March 1603, watching over the corpse as it was laid in a lead coffin and then accompanied it as it was taken by barge from Richmond to Whitehall Palace in a sombre torchlit procession. As senior peeress, Helena was chief mourner at Elizabeth’s funeral at Westminster Abbey on 28 April.
Joint tomb of Helena and Sir Thomas Gorges, Salisbury Cathedral
The reign of King James I (VI of Scots) inevitably meant changes at court and Thomas Gorges was demoted. Helena, too, lost some of her privileges. And with the death of Thomas on 30 March 1610, she increasingly retreated from public life. A devoted member of the Church of England, she died on 10 April 1635, having lived in England for almost exactly seventy years. She granted over £1,700 in annuities and bequests in her will. At the time of her death, Helena had ninety-two living, direct descendants.
Helen Snakenborg, Marchioness of Northampton, was buried in Salisbury Cathedral, beside her second husband Thomas Gorges who had been laid to rest there in 1610.
In her long life, Helena Snakenborg had been lucky enough to enjoy two happy marriages, both made for love, and to have enjoyed the love and patronage of Queen Elizabeth. Even when she had faced the wrath of the queen, Helena had managed to win back her favour.
*
Images:
Courtesy of Wikipedia
Notes:
1. CSPS, Elizabeth 1558-67, I, 475 quoted in Tracy Borman, Elizabeth’s Women, p. 278; 2. ibid; 3. ibid; 4. Paul Harrington, ‘Gorges [née Snakenborg], Helena, Lady Gorges [other married name Helena Parr, marchioness of Northampton],’ Oxforddnb.com; 5. Tracy Borman, Elizabeth’s Women, p. 281; 6. BM Cotton MS Titus B II, f. 346 quoted in Tracy Borman, Elizabeth’s Women, p. 357
Sources:
Tracy Borman, Elizabeth’s Women; Paul Harrington, ‘Gorges [née Snakenborg], Helena, Lady Gorges [other married name Helena Parr, marchioness of Northampton],’ Oxforddnb.com; Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Edward VI, Mary and Elizabeth, 1547-80, ed. Robert Lemon; Elizabeth Norton, The Lives of Tudor Women; Amy Licence, Tudor Roses: From Margaret Beaufort to Elizabeth I; Paul Kendall, Queen Elizabeth I: Life & Legacy of the Virgin Queen; Lisa Hilton, Elizabeth I: Renaissance Prince, A Biography; John Guy, Elizabeth: The Forgotten Years; Laura Brennan, Elizabeth I: The Making of a Queen; R.E. Pritchard, Sex, Love & Marriage in the Elizabethan Age; Alison Weir, Elizabeth the Queen; Neville Williams, The Life and Times of Elizabeth I; Sarah Gristwood, The Tudors in Love: The Courtly Code Behind the Last Medieval Dynasty
*
My Books:
Signed, dedicated copies of all my books are available through my online bookshop.
Out now: Scotland’s Medieval Queens
Scotland’s history is dramatic, violent and bloody. Being England’s northern neighbour has never been easy. Scotland’s queens have had to deal with war, murder, imprisonment, political rivalries and open betrayal. They have loved and lost, raised kings and queens, ruled and died for Scotland. From St Margaret, who became one of the patron saints of Scotland, to Elizabeth de Burgh and the dramatic story of the Scottish Wars of Independence, to the love story and tragedy of Joan Beaufort, to Margaret of Denmark and the dawn of the Renaissance, Scotland’s Medieval Queens have seen it all. This is the story of Scotland through their eyes.
‘Scotland’s Medieval Queens gives a thorough grounding in the history of the women who ruled Scotland at the side of its kings, often in the shadows, but just as interesting in their lives beyond the spotlight. It’s not a subject that has been widely covered, and Sharon is a pioneer in bringing that information into accessible history.’ Elizabeth Chadwick (New York Times bestselling author)
Heroines of the Tudor World tells the stories of the most remarkable women from European history in the time of the Tudor dynasty, 1485-1603. These are the women who ruled, the women who founded dynasties, the women who fought for religious freedom, their families and love. Heroines of the Tudor World is now available for pre-order from Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK.Women of the Anarchy demonstrates how Empress Matilda and Matilda of Boulogne, unable to wield a sword themselves, were prime movers in this time of conflict and lawlessness. It shows how their strengths, weaknesses, and personal ambitions swung the fortunes of war one way – and then the other. Available from Bookshop.org, Amberley Publishing and Amazon UK. King John’s Right-Hand Lady: The Story of Nicholaa de la Haye is the story of a truly remarkable lady, the hereditary constable of Lincoln Castle and the first woman in England to be appointed sheriff in her own right. Available from all good bookshops Pen & Sword Books, bookshop.org and Amazon.
Alternate Endings: An anthology of historical fiction short stories including Long Live the King… which is my take what might have happened had King John not died in October 1216. Available in paperback and kindle from Amazon.
Podcast:
Have a listen to theA Slice of Medieval podcast, which I co-host with Historical fiction novelist Derek Birks. Derek and I welcome guests, such as Bernard Cornwell and Elizabeth Chadwick, and discuss a wide range of topics in medieval history, from significant events to the personalities involved.
History... the interesting bits! 